The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiaodan [1 ]
Chen, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xi [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Zebin [5 ]
Wei, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuelong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongping [6 ]
Wu, Zhigang [6 ]
Zhu, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Univ Technol, Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Paul C Lauterbur Res Ctr Biomed Imaging, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Coll Adv Technol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Philips Healthcare China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Artificial Intelligence Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Diffusion tensor imaging; Ex-vivo human heart; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Comparison; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; MRI; REPRODUCIBILITY; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-00969-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The aim was to compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices derived from human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Additionally, the reproducibility of DTI indices was assessed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods A total of 18 ex-vivo hearts were derived from patients who underwent heart transplantation. The DTI schemes were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. Then, the same slices from each ex-vivo heart were selected for image analysis. The student's t-test or Wilcoxon-rank test was used to compare the statistical differences. The agreement of DTI indices was mainly reported as the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results No significant differences (all P > 0.05) were found in the DTI indices between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Interestingly, the ICC of all DTI indices was relatively lower with a low b-value. The reproducibility of the helix angle (HA) was relatively lower when compared to the other DTI indices. Conclusion The DTI indices of ex-vivo human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners had no significant differences. The consistency of DTI indices needed caution using a low b-value with different field strengths, and the relatively low reproducibility of HA should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The comparison of diffusion tensor imaging in human hearts between 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Xiaodan Li
    Rui Chen
    Xi Xu
    Zebin Xiao
    Xiaoyu Wei
    Yuelong Yang
    Zhongping Zhang
    Zhigang Wu
    Yanjie Zhu
    Hui Liu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23
  • [2] Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the human calf - Comparison between 1.5 T and 3.0 T - Preliminary results
    Saupe, Nadia
    White, Lawrence M.
    Sussman, Marshall S.
    Kassner, Andrea
    Tomlinson, George
    Noseworthy, Michael D.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2008, 43 (09) : 612 - 618
  • [3] Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without parallel Imaging
    Alexander, AL
    Lee, JE
    Wu, YC
    Field, AS
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 299 - +
  • [4] Diffusion tensor imaging of formalin fixed infarcted porcine hearts: a comparison between 3T and 1.5T
    R Mazumder
    S Choi
    B Raterman
    BD Clymer
    A Kolipaka
    RD White
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] Diffusion-tensor fiber tractography: Intraindividual comparison of 3.0-T and 1.5-T MR imaging
    Okada, T
    Miki, Y
    Fushimi, Y
    Hanakawa, T
    Kanagaki, M
    Yamamoto, A
    Urayama, S
    Fukuyama, H
    Hiraoka, M
    Togashi, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) : 668 - 678
  • [6] Diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Initial observations
    Hunsche, S
    Moseley, ME
    Stoeter, P
    Hedehus, M
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (02) : 550 - 556
  • [7] IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Cui, Yong
    Dyvorne, Hadrien
    Besa, Cecilia
    Cooper, Nancy
    Taouli, Bachir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2015, 2 : 123 - 128
  • [8] Direct quantitative comparison between cross-relaxation imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of the human brain at 3.0 T
    Underhil, Hunter R.
    Yuan, Chun
    Yarnykh, Vasily L.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 47 (04) : 1568 - 1578
  • [9] Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis
    Fushimi, Yasutaka
    Miki, Yukio
    Okada, Tsutomu
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Mori, Nobuyuki
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Urayama, Shin-ichi
    Aso, Toshihiko
    Fukuyama, Hidenao
    Kikuta, Ken-ichiro
    Togashi, Kaori
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (08) : 743 - 748
  • [10] Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the spine
    Phalke, Vaishali V.
    Gujar, Sachin
    Quint, Douglas J.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 241 - +