Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T:: Comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging

被引:265
|
作者
Krüger, G [1 ]
Kastrup, A [1 ]
Glover, GH [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Lucas MRS Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
关键词
neuroimaging; spiral scan; magnetic field strength; CNR; SNR; physiological noise;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.1081
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Noise properties, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal responses were compared during functional activation of the human brain at 1.5 and 3.0 T. At the higher field spiral gradient-echo (GRE) brain images revealed an average gain in SNR of 1.7 in fully relaxed and 2.2 in images with a repetition time (TR) of 1.5 sec. The tempered gain at longer Tps reflects the fact that the physiological noise depends on the signal strength acid becomes a larger fraction of the total noise at 3.0 T, Activation of the primary motor and visual cortex resulted in a 36% and 44% increase of "activated pixels" at 3.0 T, which reflects a greater sensitivity for the detection of activated gray matter at the higher field, The gain in the CNR exhibited a dependency on the underlying tissue, i.e., an Increase of 1.8x in regions of particular high activation-induced signal changes (presumably venous vessels) and of 2.2x in the average activated areas. These results demonstrate that 3.0 T provides a clear advantage over 1.5 T for neuroimaging of homogeneous brain tissue, although stronger physiological noise contributions, more complicated signal features in the proximity of strong susceptibility gradients, and changes In the intrinsic relaxation times may mediate the enhancement. Magn Reson Med 45:595-604, 2001, (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 604
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of 1.5-T and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging on the ceramic adhesion and physical properties of prosthetic substructures
    Baysal, Nurten
    Ayyildiz, Simel
    Orujalipoor, Ilghar
    Erol, Baris Filiz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06): : 809.e1 - 809.e7
  • [42] Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T
    Capuani, Silvia
    Maiuro, Alessandra
    Giampa, Emiliano
    Montuori, Marco
    Varrucciu, Viviana
    Hagberg, Gisela E.
    Vinicola, Vincenzo
    Colonna, Sergio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [43] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T pediatric brain imaging
    Zimmerman, RA
    Bilaniuk, LT
    Pollock, AN
    Feygin, T
    Zarnow, D
    Schwartz, ES
    Harris, C
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 229 - +
  • [44] Editorial for "Association Between Myocardial Oxygenation and Fibrosis in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Analysis by Rest Oxygenation-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging"
    Soulat, Gilles
    Mousseaux, Elie
    Wahbi, Karim
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (05) : 2000 - 2001
  • [45] Effects of myoglobin oxygenation on oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance images: an in-vitro study
    Michel, M.
    Gulac, P.
    Fischer, K.
    Jung, B.
    Longnus, S. L.
    Guensch, D. P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 : 1 - 2
  • [46] Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 5.0 T: quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3.0 T
    Yin, Liang
    Li, Zhangzhu
    Shang, Mingyan
    Li, Zongchang
    Tang, Bowen
    Yu, Dan
    Gan, Jie
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [47] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [48] Noninvasive oxygenation assessment after acute myocardial infarction with breathing maneuvers-induced oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging
    Shi, Ke
    Yang, Meng-Xi
    Xia, Chun-Chao
    Peng, Wan-Lin
    Zhang, Kun
    Li, Zhen-Lin
    Guo, Ying-Kun
    Yang, Zhi-Gang
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (01) : 284 - 289
  • [49] MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences
    Kornaat, PR
    Reeder, SB
    Koo, S
    Brittain, J
    Andriacchi, TP
    Gold, GE
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2004, 12 : S59 - S59
  • [50] Cardiac cine MRI: Comparison of 1.5 T, non-enhanced 3.0 T and blood pool enhanced 3.0 T imaging
    Gerretsen, S. C.
    Versluis, B.
    Bekkers, S. C. A. M.
    Leiner, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 65 (01) : 80 - 85