Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study)

被引:16
|
作者
Lista, Giuliana [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo Maria [1 ,2 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Vanni, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Cardone, Pasquale [5 ]
Peschechera, Roberto [1 ]
Forni, Giovanni [2 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Business Operat Off, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, IRCCS, Urol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
R; obot assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Vesicouretrhal anastomosis; Posterior reconstruction; Urinary continence; Functional outcomes; URINARY CONTINENCE; EAU GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; RECOVERY; CANCER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design, setting, and participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n = 72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n = 74). Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. Results and limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p = 0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately (sic)80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. Patient summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FINAL RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF EARLY DORSAL VENOUS COMPLEX (EDVC) LIGATION ON URINARY CONTINENCE RECOVERY AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Cirulli, Giuseppe
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Gallina, Andrea
    Moschini, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Nocera, Luigi
    Fossati, Nicola
    Stabile, Armando
    Scuderi, Simone
    Barletta, Francesco
    Mazzone, Elio
    Salonia, Andrea
    Bravi, Carlo Andrea
    Rosiello, Giuseppe
    Briganti, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1069 - E1070
  • [42] Low Pressure Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy With the AirSeal System at OLV Hospital: Results From a Prospective Study
    La Falce, Sabrina
    Novara, Giacomo
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Umari, Paolo
    De Naeyer, Geert
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    Beresian, Jean
    Carette, Rik
    Penicka, Martin
    Mo, Yujiing
    Vandenbroucke, Geert
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (06) : E1029 - E1037
  • [43] Predictors of Early Continence After Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Pedraza, Adriana
    Mikesell, Carter
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2024, 184 : 176 - 181
  • [44] Is robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, non randomised, comparative study
    Fracalanza, S.
    Galfano, A.
    Iafrate, M.
    Novara, G.
    Cavalleri, S.
    Artibani, W.
    Ficarra, V.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 302 - 302
  • [45] ERECTILE-FUNCTION AND ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES AFTER OPEN RETROPUBIC AND ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM A LARGE, PROSPECTIVE SWEDISH TRIAL
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Pini, Gio
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Derogar, Maryam
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Stranne, Johan
    Bjartell, Anders
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Wiklund, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E285 - E285
  • [46] Comparison of Cognitive Function After Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Study
    Beck, Stefanie
    Zins, Linnea
    Holthusen, Clara
    Rademacher, Cornelius
    von Breunig, Franziska
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Haese, Alexander
    Graefen, Markus
    Zoellner, Christian
    Fischer, Marlene
    UROLOGY, 2020, 139 : 110 - 116
  • [47] OUTCOMES OF FLUORESCENCE SUPPORTED LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Harke, Nina
    Wagner, Christian
    Urbanova, Katarina
    Godes, Michael
    Addali, Mustapha
    Fangmeyer, Bernhard
    Schuette, Andreas
    Witt, Jorn H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E199 - E199
  • [48] Suprapubic Versus Urethral Catheter for Urinary Drainage After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Leilei Xia
    Thomas J. Guzzo
    Phillip Mucksavage
    Daniel J. Lee
    Current Urology Reports, 2020, 21
  • [49] Suprapubic Versus Urethral Catheter for Urinary Drainage After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Xia, Leilei
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    Mucksavage, Phillip
    Lee, Daniel J.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 21 (08)
  • [50] Impact of Early Dorsal Venous Complex Ligation on Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bravi, Carlo A.
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Mazzone, Elio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gallina, Andrea
    Stabile, Armando
    Scuderi, Simone
    Barletta, Francesco
    Nocera, Luigi
    Rosiello, Giuseppe
    Martini, Alberto
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Deho, Federico
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (01): : 83 - 88