Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study)

被引:16
|
作者
Lista, Giuliana [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo Maria [1 ,2 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Vanni, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Cardone, Pasquale [5 ]
Peschechera, Roberto [1 ]
Forni, Giovanni [2 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Business Operat Off, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, IRCCS, Urol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
R; obot assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Vesicouretrhal anastomosis; Posterior reconstruction; Urinary continence; Functional outcomes; URINARY CONTINENCE; EAU GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; RECOVERY; CANCER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design, setting, and participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n = 72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n = 74). Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. Results and limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p = 0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately (sic)80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. Patient summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMPACT OF POSTERIOR URETHROVESICAL RECONSTRUCTION ON EARLY RETURN TO CONTINENCE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Hoogenes, Jen
    Wu, Christopher
    Wang, Yuding
    Patterson, Lisa
    Matsumoto, Edward
    Shayegan, Bobby
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1046 - E1046
  • [32] Effect of Peritoneal Fixation (PerFix) on Lymphocele Formation in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Prospective Trial
    Student Jr, Vladimir
    Tudos, Zbynek
    Studentova, Zuzana
    Cesak, Ondrej
    Studentova, Hana
    Repa, Vaclav
    Purova, Dana
    Student, Vladimir
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (02) : 154 - 162
  • [33] PROSPECTIVE NON-RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING PERIOPERATIVE DATA OF PATIENTS TREATED BY ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    Pushkar, D.
    Govorov, A.
    Kolontarev, K.
    Diakov, V
    Rasner, P.
    Bernikov, A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 50 - 51
  • [34] RETZIUS-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IMPROVES EARLY RECOVERY OF URINARY CONTINENCE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Li, Youjian
    Guo, Hongqian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E302 - E302
  • [35] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: FOUR-YEAR RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED TRIAL
    Fiori, Cristian
    Morra, Ivano
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Amparore, Daniele
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Checcucci, Enrico
    De Luca, Stefano
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E858 - E858
  • [36] EXTRAPERITONEAL VERSUS TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON WITH SINGLE SURGEON EXPERIENCE
    Erdogru, Tibet
    Avci, Ali Egemen
    Akand, Murat
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A221 - A221
  • [37] PREDICTORS FOR EARLY RETURN OF POTENCY AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Chauhan, S.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Orvieto, M.
    Sivaraman, A.
    Palmer, K. J.
    Rocco, B.
    Patel, V. R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 286 - 286
  • [38] PREDICTORS FOR EARLY RETURN OF POTENCY AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Chauhan, S.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Sivaraman, A.
    Palmer, K.
    Patel, V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A192 - A192
  • [39] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PELVIC DRAIN PLACEMENT VERSUS NO PELVIC DRAIN PLACEMENT AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RARP)
    Chennamsetty, Avinash
    Zhumkhawala, Ali
    Yuh, Bertram
    Lau, Clayton
    Chu, William
    Emtage, Justin
    Gellhaus, Paul
    Ruel, Nora
    Chan, Kevin
    Yamzon, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E363 - E364
  • [40] Final results of a prospective, randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of early Dorsal Venous Complex (eDVC) ligation on urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Montorsi, F.
    Bravi, C. A.
    Gandaglia, G.
    Fossati, N.
    Stabile, A.
    Mazzone, E.
    Rosiello, G.
    Sorce, G.
    Pellegrino, F.
    Nocera, L.
    Cirulli, G.
    Barletta, F.
    Scuderi, S.
    Salonia, A.
    Gallina, A.
    Moschini, M.
    Briganti, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1211 - S1211