Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study)

被引:16
|
作者
Lista, Giuliana [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo Maria [1 ,2 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Vanni, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Cardone, Pasquale [5 ]
Peschechera, Roberto [1 ]
Forni, Giovanni [2 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Business Operat Off, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, IRCCS, Urol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
R; obot assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Vesicouretrhal anastomosis; Posterior reconstruction; Urinary continence; Functional outcomes; URINARY CONTINENCE; EAU GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; RECOVERY; CANCER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design, setting, and participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n = 72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n = 74). Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. Results and limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p = 0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately (sic)80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. Patient summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial
    Harke, Nina Natascha
    Wagner, Christian
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Urbanova, Katarina
    Addali, Mustapha
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Witt, Jorn H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 771 - 777
  • [22] Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial
    Nina Natascha Harke
    Christian Wagner
    Nikolaos Liakos
    Katarina Urbanova
    Mustapha Addali
    Boris A. Hadaschik
    Jorn H. Witt
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 771 - 777
  • [23] Initial experience with first postoperative day Foley catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Paludo, Artur de Oliveira
    Knijnik, Pedro Glusman
    Silva Neto, Brasil
    Berger, Milton
    Aron, Monish
    Desai, Mihir
    Berger, Andre Kives
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (05) : 555 - 557
  • [24] COMPARISON OF URINARY CONTINENCE BETWEEN RETZIUS-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND CONVENTIONAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: PRELIMINARY DATA FROM A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Xu, Linfeng
    Ma, Haoxin
    Li, Xiaogong
    Guo, Hongqian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E568 - E568
  • [25] Early Removal of Urethral Catheter with Suprapubic Tube Drainage Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage Alone after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Large, Michael C.
    Patel, Amit R.
    Famakinwa, Olufenwa
    Galocy, R. Matthew
    Karrison, Theodore
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01): : 89 - 95
  • [26] Transurethral versus suprapubic catheter at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up
    A. Martinschek
    D. Pfalzgraf
    B. Rafail
    M. Ritter
    E. Heinrich
    L. Trojan
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 407 - 411
  • [27] Transurethral versus suprapubic catheter at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up
    Martinschek, A.
    Pfalzgraf, D.
    Rafail, B.
    Ritter, M.
    Heinrich, E.
    Trojan, L.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (03) : 407 - 411
  • [28] Antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of catheter removal after radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial
    Berrondo, Claudia
    Feng, Changyong
    Kukreja, Janet B.
    Messing, Edward M.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (03) : 181.e7 - 181.e14
  • [29] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF OPEN AND ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY DATABASE
    Fairey, Adrian
    Hobart, Michael
    Bochinski, Derek
    Evans, Howard
    Chetner, Michael
    Jacobsen, Neils-Erik
    Mador, David
    Rourke, Keith
    Van Zyl, Stephan
    Voaklander, Don
    Zorn, Jeff
    Roy, Joey
    Estey, Eric
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E678 - E678
  • [30] Anastomotic leaks and catheter time after salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Bandini, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 : S141 - S143