Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders

被引:0
|
作者
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto [1 ]
Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade [1 ]
Dias, Celia da Consolacao [1 ]
Dias Miranda, Angelica Conceicao
机构
[1] Univ Fed Espirito Santos, Campus Goiabeiras, Vitoria, ES, Brazil
关键词
Open Science; Scientific communication; Mathematical methods; Statistical methods; Factor analysis; Information Science;
D O I
10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670366
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction: Composed by several movements, Open Science has been gaining considerable notoriety in the search for increasing confidence in the research results, seeking transparency in all the elements that make up a scientific investigation process. Objective: In this scenario, this article aims to analyze the importance attributed by actors involved with Open Science and its movements and initiatives. Method: A questionnaire was sent to personalities involved in the scientific process: two groups of messaging and communication applications in audio and video over the internet and a discussion list of actors interested in the topic, composed of librarians, researchers, professors and editors. Structured by 1 open question and 20 variables related to Open Science, the respondents were instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale the importance of each one, observing the context of scientific communication developed at the public university. Results: With the assistance of SPSS, descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and mean were performed. In addition, a factor analysis was applied and the possibility of condensing the information into a total of four components was identified. Conclusion: Through this study, it was concluded that, in spite of alternating the frequency, the most important mode was registered for all variables, indicating that all the initiatives and movements listed in the study were considered important by the actors involved with Open Science.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Yessirkepov, Marlen
    Voronov, Alexander A.
    Gerasimov, Alexey N.
    Kostyukova, Elena I.
    Kitas, George D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 30 (11) : 1545 - 1552
  • [42] Improving Visual Communication of Science Through the Incorporation of Graphic Design Theories and Practices Into Science Communication
    Estrada, Fabiola Cristina Rodriguez
    Davis, Lloyd Spencer
    [J]. SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2015, 37 (01) : 140 - 148
  • [43] Science communication: Science fresh from the box
    Scott E.
    [J]. Nature, 2012, 492 (7428) : 184 - 185
  • [44] Science communication challenges about antimicrobial resistance in animal agriculture: insights from stakeholders
    King, Andy J.
    Wald, Dara M.
    Coberley, Denise D.
    Dahlstrom, Michael F.
    Plummer, Paul J.
    [J]. JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2022, 4 (02):
  • [45] The Importance of Lay Summaries for Improving Science Communication
    Goldstein, Carly M.
    Krukowski, Rebecca A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023,
  • [46] The Design of a Community Science Cloud: The Open Science Data Cloud Perspective
    Grossman, Robert L.
    Greenway, Matthew
    Heath, Allison P.
    Powell, Ray
    Suarez, Rafael D.
    Wells, Walt
    White, Kevin
    Atkinson, Malcolm
    Klampanos, Iraklis
    Alvarez, Heidi L.
    Harvey, Christine
    Mambretti, Joe J.
    [J]. 2012 SC COMPANION: HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING, NETWORKING, STORAGE AND ANALYSIS (SCC), 2012, : 1051 - 1057
  • [47] Open science practices for eating disorders research
    Burke, Natasha L.
    Frank, Guido K. W.
    Hilbert, Anja
    Hildebrandt, Thomas
    Klump, Kelly L.
    Thomas, Jennifer J.
    Wade, Tracey D.
    Walsh, B. Timothy
    Wang, Shirley B.
    Weissman, Ruth Striegel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2021, 54 (10) : 1719 - 1729
  • [48] Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science
    Jorge, Nelson R.
    Ouwehand, Martijn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2018, 19 (04): : 257 - 259
  • [49] A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices
    Bowman, Nicholas David
    Keene, Justin Robert
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2018, 35 (04) : 363 - 372
  • [50] Open Science Practices at the Journal of Traumatic Stress
    Kerig, Patricia K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2020, 33 (02) : 133 - 136