Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication

被引:29
|
作者
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri [1 ,2 ]
Yessirkepov, Marlen [3 ]
Voronov, Alexander A. [4 ]
Gerasimov, Alexey N. [5 ]
Kostyukova, Elena I. [6 ]
Kitas, George D. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Russells Hall Hosp, Teaching Trust,Dept Rheumatol, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Russells Hall Hosp, Teaching Trust,Dept Res & Dev, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[3] South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceut Acad, Dept Biochem Biol & Microbiol, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
[4] Kuban State Univ, Dept Mkt & Trade Deals, Krasnodar 350751, Russia
[5] Stavropol State Agrarian Univ, Dept Stat & Econometr, Stavropol, Russia
[6] Stavropol State Agrarian Univ, Dept Accounting Management, Fac Accounting & Finance, Stavropol, Russia
[7] Univ Manchester, Arthrit Res UK Epidemiol Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Science Communication; Bibliography as Topic; Periodicals as Topic; Citations; Publication Ethics;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Citations to scholarly items are building bricks for multidisciplinary science communication. Citation analyses are currently influencing individual career advancement and ranking of academic and research institutions worldwide. This article overviews the involvement of scientific authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, indexers, and learned associations in the citing and referencing to preserve the integrity of science communication. Authors are responsible for thorough bibliographic searches to select relevant references for their articles, comprehend main points, and cite them in an ethical way. Reviewers and editors may perform additional searches and recommend missing essential references. Publishers, in turn, are in a position to instruct their authors over the citations and references, provide tools for validation of references, and open access to bibliographies. Publicly available reference lists bear important information about the novelty and relatedness of the scholarly items with the published literature. Few editorial associations have dealt with the issue of citations and properly managed references. As a prime example, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) issued in December 2014 an updated set of recommendations on the need for citing primary literature and avoiding unethical references, which are applicable to the global scientific community. With the exponential growth of literature and related references, it is critically important to define functions of all stakeholders of science communication in curbing the issue of irrational and unethical citations and thereby improve the quality and indexability of scholarly journals.
引用
收藏
页码:1545 / 1552
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Indirect communication by citations and references in psychology. An exemplary content analysis of references and types of citations
    Krampen, Guenter
    Becker, Ralf
    Montada, Leo
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 2008, 59 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [2] Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Yessirkepov, Marlen
    Diyanova, Svetlana N.
    Kitas, George D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 30 (08) : 1010 - 1016
  • [3] Scientific Communication in Clinical Psychology: Examining Patterns of Citations and References
    Kiselica, Andrew M.
    Ruscio, John
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2014, 21 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [4] On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications
    Günter Krampen
    Ralf Becker
    Ute Wahner
    Leo Montada
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 71 : 191 - 202
  • [5] MANAGING COMMUNICATION IN INTEGRITY BASED CRISIS: DEALING WITH STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTIONS
    Usero, Belen
    Hernandez, Virginia
    Ramirez, Julianna Paola
    [J]. 13TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE EUROMED ACADEMY OF BUSINESS: BUSINESS THEORY AND PRACTICE ACROSS INDUSTRIES AND MARKETS, 2020, : 1512 - 1513
  • [6] On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications
    Krampen, Guenter
    Becker, Ralf
    Wahner, Ute
    Montada, Leo
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 71 (02) : 191 - 202
  • [7] PIC: Preserving Data Integrity in UAV Assisted Communication
    Abhishek, Nalam Venkata
    Aman, Muhammad Naveed
    Lim, Teng Joon
    Sikdar, Biplab
    [J]. IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2022,
  • [8] Importance of open science and science communication practices from the perspective of stakeholders
    Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
    Oliveira, Dalgiza Andrade
    Dias, Celia da Consolacao
    Dias Miranda, Angelica Conceicao
    [J]. RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2022, 20
  • [9] References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature
    Bould, M. Dylan
    Hladkowicz, Emily S.
    Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E.
    Ufholz, Lee-Anne
    Postonogova, Tatyana
    Shin, Eunkyung
    Boet, Sylvain
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [10] Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google scholar citations
    Luis Ortega, Jose
    Aguillo, Isidro F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 63 (12): : 2370 - 2377