A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices

被引:34
|
作者
Bowman, Nicholas David [1 ]
Keene, Justin Robert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Commun Studies, Interact Lab Ixlab, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Creat Media Ind, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Coll Media & Commun, Cognit & Emot Lab, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Open Science; Preregistered Reports; Research Ethics; Transparency;
D O I
10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The open science movement, although not new to social science broadly, has gained momentum recently within communication science. In response, journals in our field have begun encouraging open science practices, from data and materials sharing to submitting preregistered research reports. However, this momentum has also led to some confusion over what is and is not considered open science and what the value of open sciences practices is. In this editorial we lay out an "onion model" of open science that describes increasing levels of transparency and suggests howopen science practices can be understood less as a revolutionary concept but more as a logical extension of some of the historical pillars of scientific norms. Through this model, we provide tangible steps for how scholarsmay begin thinking about how to introduce open science practices into their current and future empirical efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 372
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advantages and challenges to open science practices
    Dezhina, Irina G.
    [J]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2023, 21 (03): : 70 - 87
  • [2] Negotiating Open Science: The Open Science Framework as a Technology-in-Practice
    Cohoon, Johanna
    [J]. CONFERENCE COMPANION PUBLICATION OF THE 2021 COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, CSCW 2021 COMPANION, 2021, : 245 - 248
  • [3] FOSE: a framework for open science evaluation
    Walther, Alexander
    van den Bosch, Jasper J. F.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [4] Seven steps to enhance Open Science practices in animal science
    Munoz-Tamayo, Rafael
    Nielsen, Birte L.
    Gagaoua, Mohammed
    Gondret, Florence
    Krause, E. Tobias
    Morgavi, Diego P.
    Olsson, I. Anna S.
    Pastell, Matti
    Taghipoor, Masoomeh
    Tedeschi, Luis
    Veissier, Isabelle
    Nawroth, Christian
    [J]. PNAS NEXUS, 2022, 1 (03):
  • [5] Open science practices for eating disorders research
    Burke, Natasha L.
    Frank, Guido K. W.
    Hilbert, Anja
    Hildebrandt, Thomas
    Klump, Kelly L.
    Thomas, Jennifer J.
    Wade, Tracey D.
    Walsh, B. Timothy
    Wang, Shirley B.
    Weissman, Ruth Striegel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2021, 54 (10) : 1719 - 1729
  • [6] Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science
    Jorge, Nelson R.
    Ouwehand, Martijn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2018, 19 (04): : 257 - 259
  • [7] Open Science Practices at the Journal of Traumatic Stress
    Kerig, Patricia K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2020, 33 (02) : 133 - 136
  • [8] Use of Open Science Practices in Surgical Journals
    Pathak, Kavya
    Marwaha, Jayson S.
    Chen, Hao Wei
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Matthews, Jeffrey B.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2024, 159 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [9] A guide to open science practices for animal research
    Diederich, Kai
    Schmitt, Kathrin
    Schwedhelm, Philipp
    Bert, Bettina
    Heinl, Celine
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2022, 20 (09)
  • [10] Survey on Open Science Practices in Functional Neuroimaging
    Paret, Christian
    Unverhau, Nike
    Feingold, Franklin
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    Stirner, Madita
    Schmahl, Christian
    Sicorello, Maurizio
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 257