The Challenges of Outcomes-Based Contract Implementation for Medicines in Europe

被引:19
|
作者
Bohm, Natalie [1 ]
Bermingham, Sarah [2 ]
Grimsey Jones, Frank [2 ]
Goncalves-Bradley, Daniela C. [2 ]
Diamantopoulos, Alex [2 ]
Burton, Jessica R. [1 ]
Laing, Hamish [3 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks,Dorking Rd, Tadworth KT20 7NS, England
[2] Symmetron Ltd, London, England
[3] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Value Based Hlth & Care Acad, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
RISK-SHARING ARRANGEMENTS; AGREEMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-021-01070-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim was to outline the challenges of implementing outcomes-based contracts (OBCs) in Europe. Methods A scoping review was conducted, building on the searches of a previous systematic review and updating them for December 2017 until May 2021. The combined results were screened, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All identified studies published in the English language that described specific OBC schemes for medicines in European countries were included. Insights into the challenges of OBCs were extracted and analysed to develop a conceptual framework. Results Ten articles from the previous systematic review matched our inclusion criteria, along with 14 articles from electronic searches. Analysis of these 24 articles and classification of the challenges revealed that there are multiple barriers that must be overcome if OBCs that benefit all stakeholders are going to be adopted widely across Europe. These challenges were grouped according to five key themes: negotiation framework; outcomes; data; administration and implementation; and laws and regulation. Conclusions If the promise of OBCs is to be fully realised in Europe, there remain major challenges that need to be overcome by all stakeholders working in partnership. The overlapping and interconnected nature of these challenges highlights the complexity of OBC arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 29
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OUTCOMES-BASED ARRANGEMENTS IN ONCOLOGY: A LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
    Carlson, J. J.
    Chen, S.
    Dhanda, D. S.
    Ramsey, S. D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S70 - S70
  • [32] Awarding Credit for Outcomes-Based Professional Development
    Dickerson, Pamela S.
    Shinners, Jean
    Chappell, Kathy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2017, 48 (03): : 97 - 98
  • [33] Outcomes-based assessment as an assurance education tool
    Older, S
    Chin, SK
    [J]. SECURITY EDUCATION AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES, 2003, 125 : 179 - 196
  • [34] Outcomes-Based Computing Accreditation: Program Assessment
    Yaverbaum, Gayle
    Reichgelt, Han
    Lidtke, Doris
    Zweben, Stu
    [J]. SIGCSE 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH SIGCSE TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, : 281 - 282
  • [35] Contracting 'person-centred' working by results: street-level managers and frontline experiences in an outcomes-based contract
    Carter, Eleanor
    Rosenbach, Franziska
    Domingos, Fernando
    van Lier, Felix-Anselm
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [36] Outcomes-based drug coverage in British Columbia
    Morgan, S
    Bassett, K
    Mintzes, B
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2004, 23 (03) : 269 - 276
  • [37] Hepatitis C Screening - An Outcomes-Based Analysis
    Junna, Shilpa
    Wadeea, Rita
    Golden, Todd
    Torabi, Mohamed
    Dagar, Meenakshi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S521 - S521
  • [38] An Outcomes-based Approach to Curriculum Development in Pharmacy
    Ho, Susan S. S.
    Kember, David
    Lau, Clara B. S.
    Yeung, Mary Y. M. Au
    Leung, Doris Y. P.
    Chow, Moses S. S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 73 (01)
  • [39] State boards consider outcomes-based regulation
    Landis, NT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1999, 56 (08) : 699 - 700
  • [40] Tuks medical students go outcomes-based
    van der Linde, I
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 87 (10): : 1330 - +