The Challenges of Outcomes-Based Contract Implementation for Medicines in Europe

被引:19
|
作者
Bohm, Natalie [1 ]
Bermingham, Sarah [2 ]
Grimsey Jones, Frank [2 ]
Goncalves-Bradley, Daniela C. [2 ]
Diamantopoulos, Alex [2 ]
Burton, Jessica R. [1 ]
Laing, Hamish [3 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks,Dorking Rd, Tadworth KT20 7NS, England
[2] Symmetron Ltd, London, England
[3] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Value Based Hlth & Care Acad, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
RISK-SHARING ARRANGEMENTS; AGREEMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-021-01070-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim was to outline the challenges of implementing outcomes-based contracts (OBCs) in Europe. Methods A scoping review was conducted, building on the searches of a previous systematic review and updating them for December 2017 until May 2021. The combined results were screened, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All identified studies published in the English language that described specific OBC schemes for medicines in European countries were included. Insights into the challenges of OBCs were extracted and analysed to develop a conceptual framework. Results Ten articles from the previous systematic review matched our inclusion criteria, along with 14 articles from electronic searches. Analysis of these 24 articles and classification of the challenges revealed that there are multiple barriers that must be overcome if OBCs that benefit all stakeholders are going to be adopted widely across Europe. These challenges were grouped according to five key themes: negotiation framework; outcomes; data; administration and implementation; and laws and regulation. Conclusions If the promise of OBCs is to be fully realised in Europe, there remain major challenges that need to be overcome by all stakeholders working in partnership. The overlapping and interconnected nature of these challenges highlights the complexity of OBC arrangements.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 29
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Edoxaban and the need for outcomes-based NOAC dosing
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Washam, Jeffrey B.
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9984): : 2232 - 2233
  • [22] Music and Theory: Reflecting on Outcomes-Based Assessment
    Stinson, Susan W.
    [J]. GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON DANCE PEDAGOGY: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, SPECIAL CONFERENCE: CONGRESS ON RESEARCH IN DANCE, 2009 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 194 - 198
  • [23] Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Outcomes-Based Analysis
    Junna, Shilpa
    Ghazala, Sehem
    Ghazala, Laith
    Golden, Todd
    Wadeea, Rita
    Dagar, Meenakshi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S148 - S148
  • [24] Building infrastructure for outcomes-based agreements in Canada: can administrative health data be used to support an outcomes-based agreement in oncology?
    Winson Y. Cheung
    Chris Cameron
    Arif Mitha
    Allison Wills
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [25] OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION: IS IT RIGHT FOR SOCIAL WORK?
    Simpson, Barbara
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK-MAATSKAPLIKE WERK, 2010, 46 (03): : 274 - 282
  • [26] Accountability Is Everything: Outcomes-Based Pharmaceutical Agreements
    Gonzalez, Javier
    [J]. AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2019, 12 (06): : 277 - 278
  • [27] How to Measure Wellbeing in Outcomes-based Commissioning?
    Tirronen, Anniina
    Stenvall, Jari
    Kinder, Tony
    Tienhaara, Piia
    Rossi, Paula
    [J]. LEX LOCALIS-JOURNAL OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT, 2020, 18 (01): : 123 - 142
  • [28] An outcomes-based approach to just world beliefs
    Mudrack, PE
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (04) : 817 - 830
  • [29] Outcomes-based education for a changing health service
    Morrison, J
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (07) : 648 - 649
  • [30] Outcomes-based integrated hybrid PBL curriculum
    Whelan, AM
    Mansour, S
    Farmer, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2002, 66 (03) : 302 - 311