Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for chlamydia on admission to detention

被引:43
|
作者
Blake, DR
Gaydos, CA
Quinn, TC
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.OLQ.0000109517.07062.FC
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infections can lead to serious and costly sequelae. Because chlamydia is most often asymptomatic, many infected youth do not seek testing. Entry to a detention system provides an opportunity to screen and treat many at-risk youth. Goal. The goal of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of screening male youth for chlamydia on entry to detention. Study Design: Incremental cost-effectiveness of 3 chlamydia screening strategies was compared for a hypothetical cohort of 4000 male youth per year: 1) universal chlamydia screening using a urine-based nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), 2) selective NAAT screening of urine leukocyte esterase (LE)-positive urines, and 3) no screening. The model incorporated programmatic costs of screening and treatment and medical cost savings from sequelae prevented in infected males and female partners. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective. Results: Chlamydia prevalence in the sampled population of 594 was 4.8%, and the average number of female sexual partners/infected male was 1.6. Universal NAAT screening was the most cost-effective strategy, preventing 37 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and 3 more cases of epididymitis than selective screening and saving an additional $24,000. The analysis was sensitive to NAAT cost, LE sensitivity, rate of PID development, PID sequelae cost, and number of female partners. Universal screening remained the most cost saving for prevalence as low as 2.8% or higher. Conclusions: Universal chlamydia screening of adolescent males on entry to detention was the most cost-effective strategy. Savings are primarily the result of the prevention of PID in recent and future partners of index males. Screening detained male youth using a urine-based NAAT provides a public health opportunity to significantly reduce chlamydia infections in youth at risk for sexually transmitted diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of natural history parameters on the cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia trachomatis screening strategies
    Hu, Delphine
    Hook, Edward W., III
    Goldie, Sue J.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2006, 33 (07) : 428 - 436
  • [42] The Program Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Men for Chlamydia to Prevent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in Women
    Gift, Thomas L.
    Gaydos, Charlotte A.
    Kent, Charlotte K.
    Marrazzo, Jeanne M.
    Rietmeijer, Cornelis A.
    Schillinger, Julia A.
    Dunne, Eileen F.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2008, 35 (11) : S66 - S75
  • [43] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SCREENING FOR CHLAMYDIA, GONORRHEA, AND M. GENITALIUM: MONOVALENT VERSUS MULTIVALENT TESTING
    Spicknall, Ian
    Gift, Thomas
    Manhart, Lisa E.
    Golden, Matthew
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2014, 41 : S126 - S127
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of screening for deep vein thrombosis by ultrasound at admission to stroke rehabilitation
    Wilson, RA
    Murray, PK
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (10): : 1941 - 1948
  • [45] Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males
    Wang, Li Yan
    Hamilton, Deven T.
    Rosenberg, Eli S.
    Aslam, Maria, V
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    Katz, David A.
    Dunville, Richard L.
    Barrios, Lisa C.
    Goodreau, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2020, 66 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV
    Thrasher, AD
    Ford, CL
    Nearing, KA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (20): : 2137 - 2137
  • [47] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LEAD SCREENING
    BERWICK, DM
    KOMAROFF, AL
    SHERMAN, H
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (02): : A291 - A291
  • [48] The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening
    Smith, WJ
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 11 (01) : 83 - 85
  • [49] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SCREENING FOR HEMOCHROMATOSIS
    GUZMAN, G
    PHATAK, PD
    WOLL, J
    PHELPS, CE
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 39 (02): : A348 - A348
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening
    Black, WC
    Tosteson, ANA
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (02): : 111 - 111