Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for chlamydia on admission to detention

被引:43
|
作者
Blake, DR
Gaydos, CA
Quinn, TC
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.OLQ.0000109517.07062.FC
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infections can lead to serious and costly sequelae. Because chlamydia is most often asymptomatic, many infected youth do not seek testing. Entry to a detention system provides an opportunity to screen and treat many at-risk youth. Goal. The goal of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of screening male youth for chlamydia on entry to detention. Study Design: Incremental cost-effectiveness of 3 chlamydia screening strategies was compared for a hypothetical cohort of 4000 male youth per year: 1) universal chlamydia screening using a urine-based nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), 2) selective NAAT screening of urine leukocyte esterase (LE)-positive urines, and 3) no screening. The model incorporated programmatic costs of screening and treatment and medical cost savings from sequelae prevented in infected males and female partners. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective. Results: Chlamydia prevalence in the sampled population of 594 was 4.8%, and the average number of female sexual partners/infected male was 1.6. Universal NAAT screening was the most cost-effective strategy, preventing 37 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and 3 more cases of epididymitis than selective screening and saving an additional $24,000. The analysis was sensitive to NAAT cost, LE sensitivity, rate of PID development, PID sequelae cost, and number of female partners. Universal screening remained the most cost saving for prevalence as low as 2.8% or higher. Conclusions: Universal chlamydia screening of adolescent males on entry to detention was the most cost-effective strategy. Savings are primarily the result of the prevention of PID in recent and future partners of index males. Screening detained male youth using a urine-based NAAT provides a public health opportunity to significantly reduce chlamydia infections in youth at risk for sexually transmitted diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age:: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Hu, D
    Hook, EW
    Goldie, SJ
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (07) : 501 - 513
  • [22] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF HEMOCULT SCREENING
    PEDERSEN, KM
    KRONBORG, O
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1986, 46 : 67 - 67
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for GDM
    Van Leeuwen, Marsha
    Vijgen, Sylvia
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Evers, Inge
    Mol, Ben Willem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S109 - S109
  • [24] SCREENING FOR SCOLIOSIS - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    MONTGOMERY, F
    PERSSON, U
    BENONI, G
    WILLNER, S
    LINDGREN, B
    SPINE, 1990, 15 (02) : 67 - 70
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analysis in mammography screening
    vonFournier, D
    RADIOLOGE, 1996, 36 (04): : 300 - 305
  • [26] GLAUCOMA SCREENING - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    GOTTLIEB, LK
    SCHWARTZ, B
    PAUKER, SG
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1983, 28 (03) : 206 - 228
  • [27] Dynamic modelling for estimating the cost-effectiveness of a Chlamydia trachomatis screening program
    de Vries, R.
    van Bergen, J. E. A. M.
    de Jong-van den Berg, L. T. W.
    Postma, M. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 62 (06) : 736 - 736
  • [28] Dynamic modelling for estimating the cost-effectiveness of a Chlamydia trachomatis screening program
    De Vries, R
    Postma, MJ
    De Jong-van den Berg, LT
    Van Bergn, J
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (06) : A57 - A57
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies for Chlamydia Trachomatis infections in France
    Préaubert, N
    Delaveyne, R
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (06) : 758 - 758
  • [30] Colorectal cancer: Cost-effectiveness of screening and chemoprevention in average risk males
    Coffindaffer, J. W.
    Miller, L. A.
    Auber, M.
    Jacknowitz, A.
    Scott, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (03) : A126 - A127