Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for chlamydia on admission to detention

被引:43
|
作者
Blake, DR
Gaydos, CA
Quinn, TC
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Worcester, MA 01655 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.OLQ.0000109517.07062.FC
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Chlamydia trachomatis infections can lead to serious and costly sequelae. Because chlamydia is most often asymptomatic, many infected youth do not seek testing. Entry to a detention system provides an opportunity to screen and treat many at-risk youth. Goal. The goal of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of screening male youth for chlamydia on entry to detention. Study Design: Incremental cost-effectiveness of 3 chlamydia screening strategies was compared for a hypothetical cohort of 4000 male youth per year: 1) universal chlamydia screening using a urine-based nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), 2) selective NAAT screening of urine leukocyte esterase (LE)-positive urines, and 3) no screening. The model incorporated programmatic costs of screening and treatment and medical cost savings from sequelae prevented in infected males and female partners. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective. Results: Chlamydia prevalence in the sampled population of 594 was 4.8%, and the average number of female sexual partners/infected male was 1.6. Universal NAAT screening was the most cost-effective strategy, preventing 37 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and 3 more cases of epididymitis than selective screening and saving an additional $24,000. The analysis was sensitive to NAAT cost, LE sensitivity, rate of PID development, PID sequelae cost, and number of female partners. Universal screening remained the most cost saving for prevalence as low as 2.8% or higher. Conclusions: Universal chlamydia screening of adolescent males on entry to detention was the most cost-effective strategy. Savings are primarily the result of the prevention of PID in recent and future partners of index males. Screening detained male youth using a urine-based NAAT provides a public health opportunity to significantly reduce chlamydia infections in youth at risk for sexually transmitted diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CHLAMYDIA TESTING IN SCOTLAND
    Looker, K. J.
    Wallace, L.
    Turner, K. M. E.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2015, 91 : A147 - A147
  • [32] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CHLAMYDIA TESTING IN SCOTLAND
    Wallace, Lesley
    Looker, Katharine
    Turner, Katy
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2015, 91 : A80 - +
  • [33] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SCREENING
    POLE, JD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1971, 64 (12): : 1256 - &
  • [34] Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Schousboe, John T.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Abraham, Linn
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Advani, Shailesh
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Zhang, Dongyu
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Braithwaite, Dejana
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 175 (01) : 11 - +
  • [35] Screening for Melanoma in Men: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Adewole S. Adamson
    Jamie A. Jarmul
    Michael P. Pignone
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 1175 - 1181
  • [36] The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Teleglaucoma Screening Device
    Thomas, Sera
    Hodge, William
    Malvankar-Mehta, Monali
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [37] Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Rosenberg, Marjorie A.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Smith, Maureen A.
    Robinson, Stephen M.
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (11): : 774 - 782
  • [38] Screening for malignant melanoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Freedberg, KA
    Geller, AC
    Miller, DR
    Lew, RA
    Koh, HK
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 41 (05) : 738 - 745
  • [39] Screening for Melanoma in Men: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Adamson, Adewole S.
    Jarmul, Jamie A.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (04) : 1175 - 1181
  • [40] IS IT COST-BENEFICIAL TO SCREEN ADOLESCENT MALES FOR CHLAMYDIA
    ALEXANDER, ER
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (05) : 531 - 532