Comparison of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methods, Incorporating Male and Female Anatomical Differences, for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Definitive Pelvic Radiotherapy

被引:12
|
作者
O'Connor, Laura M. [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Jae H. [1 ,3 ]
Dowling, Jason A. [4 ]
Warren-Forward, Helen [2 ]
Martin, Jarad [1 ,5 ]
Greer, Peter B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Australian E Hlth Res Ctr, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
MRI radiotherapy planning; image-guided radiotherapy; synthetic CT; computer-assisted radiotherapy planning; rectum neoplasms; cervix neoplasms; endometrium neoplasms; anal canal neoplasms; BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY; CT GENERATION; ELECTRON-DENSITY; MRI; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.822687
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThere are several means of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only planning; however, much of the research omits large pelvic treatment regions and female anatomical specific methods. This research aimed to apply four of the most popular methods of sCT creation to facilitate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning for male and female anorectal and gynecological neoplasms. sCT methods were validated against conventional computed tomography (CT), with regard to Hounsfield unit (HU) estimation and plan dosimetry. Methods and MaterialsPaired MRI and CT scans of 40 patients were used for sCT generation and validation. Bulk density assignment, tissue class density assignment, hybrid atlas, and deep learning sCT generation methods were applied to all 40 patients. Dosimetric accuracy was assessed by dose difference at reference point, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters, and 3D gamma dose comparison. HU estimation was assessed by mean error and mean absolute error in HU value between each sCT and CT. ResultsThe median percentage dose difference between the CT and sCT was <1.0% for all sCT methods. The deep learning method resulted in the lowest median percentage dose difference to CT at -0.03% (IQR 0.13, -0.31) and bulk density assignment resulted in the greatest difference at -0.73% (IQR -0.10, -1.01). The mean 3D gamma dose agreement at 3%/2 mm among all sCT methods was 99.8%. The highest agreement at 1%/1 mm was 97.3% for the deep learning method and the lowest was 93.6% for the bulk density method. Deep learning and hybrid atlas techniques gave the lowest difference to CT in mean error and mean absolute error in HU estimation. ConclusionsAll methods of sCT generation used in this study resulted in similarly high dosimetric agreement for MRI-only planning of male and female cancer pelvic regions. The choice of the sCT generation technique can be guided by department resources available and image guidance considerations, with minimal impact on dosimetric accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy
    Gonzalez-Moya, A.
    Dufreneix, S.
    Ouyessad, N.
    Guillerminet, C.
    Autret, D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (06): : 191 - 197
  • [2] Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-only rectum radiotherapy with a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution
    Maspero, Matteo
    Tyyger, Marcus D.
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Seevinck, Peter R.
    Intven, Martijn P. W.
    van den Berg, Cornelis A. T.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 : 58 - 64
  • [3] Systematic Review of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methodologies for Use in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Radiation Therapy
    Johnstone, Emily
    Wyatt, Jonathan J.
    Henry, Ann M.
    Short, Susan C.
    Sebag-Montefiore, David
    Murray, Louise
    Kelly, Charles G.
    McCallum, Hazel M.
    Speight, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (01): : 199 - 217
  • [4] Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps
    Fusella, M.
    Andres, E. Alvarez
    Villegas, F.
    Milan, L.
    Janssen, T. M.
    Dal Bello, R.
    Garibaldi, C.
    Placidi, L.
    Cusumano, D.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32
  • [5] Synthetic computed tomography based dose calculation in prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy
    Koivula, Lauri
    Seppala, Tiina
    Collan, Juhani
    Visapaa, Harri
    Tenhunen, Mikko
    Korhonen, Arthur
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
  • [6] Comparison of synthetic CT generation methods for MRI-only definitive pelvic radiotherapy
    O'Connor, L.
    Choi, J. H.
    Dowling, J.
    Warren-Forward, H.
    Martin, J.
    Greer, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S283 - S284
  • [7] Evaluation of the Geometric and Dosimetric Accuracy of Synthetic Computed Tomography Images for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-only Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Fatemi, Ali
    Kanakamedala, Madhava R.
    Yang, Claus Chunli
    Morris, Bart
    Duggar, William N.
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [8] Assessment of dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-only solution for external beam radiotherapy of pelvic anatomy
    Kemppainen, Reko
    Suilamo, Sami
    Ranta, Iiro
    Pesola, Marko
    Halkola, Aleksi
    Eufemio, Alvin
    Minn, Heikki
    Keyrilainen, Jani
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11 : 1 - 8
  • [9] Cone beam computed tomography image guidance within a magnetic resonance imaging-only planning workflow
    O'Connor, Laura M.
    Quinn, Alesha
    Denley, Samuel
    Leigh, Lucy
    Martin, Jarad
    Dowling, Jason A.
    Skehan, Kate
    Warren-Forward, Helen
    Greer, Peter B.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
  • [10] Cone beam computed tomography based image guidance and quality assessment of prostate cancer for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy in the pelvis
    Edmund, Jens M.
    Andreasen, Daniel
    Van Leemput, Koen
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 18 : 55 - 60