Comparison of Synthetic Computed Tomography Generation Methods, Incorporating Male and Female Anatomical Differences, for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Definitive Pelvic Radiotherapy

被引:12
|
作者
O'Connor, Laura M. [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Jae H. [1 ,3 ]
Dowling, Jason A. [4 ]
Warren-Forward, Helen [2 ]
Martin, Jarad [1 ,5 ]
Greer, Peter B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Australian E Hlth Res Ctr, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
MRI radiotherapy planning; image-guided radiotherapy; synthetic CT; computer-assisted radiotherapy planning; rectum neoplasms; cervix neoplasms; endometrium neoplasms; anal canal neoplasms; BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY; CT GENERATION; ELECTRON-DENSITY; MRI; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.822687
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThere are several means of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only planning; however, much of the research omits large pelvic treatment regions and female anatomical specific methods. This research aimed to apply four of the most popular methods of sCT creation to facilitate MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning for male and female anorectal and gynecological neoplasms. sCT methods were validated against conventional computed tomography (CT), with regard to Hounsfield unit (HU) estimation and plan dosimetry. Methods and MaterialsPaired MRI and CT scans of 40 patients were used for sCT generation and validation. Bulk density assignment, tissue class density assignment, hybrid atlas, and deep learning sCT generation methods were applied to all 40 patients. Dosimetric accuracy was assessed by dose difference at reference point, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters, and 3D gamma dose comparison. HU estimation was assessed by mean error and mean absolute error in HU value between each sCT and CT. ResultsThe median percentage dose difference between the CT and sCT was <1.0% for all sCT methods. The deep learning method resulted in the lowest median percentage dose difference to CT at -0.03% (IQR 0.13, -0.31) and bulk density assignment resulted in the greatest difference at -0.73% (IQR -0.10, -1.01). The mean 3D gamma dose agreement at 3%/2 mm among all sCT methods was 99.8%. The highest agreement at 1%/1 mm was 97.3% for the deep learning method and the lowest was 93.6% for the bulk density method. Deep learning and hybrid atlas techniques gave the lowest difference to CT in mean error and mean absolute error in HU estimation. ConclusionsAll methods of sCT generation used in this study resulted in similarly high dosimetric agreement for MRI-only planning of male and female cancer pelvic regions. The choice of the sCT generation technique can be guided by department resources available and image guidance considerations, with minimal impact on dosimetric accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility of Synthetic Computed Tomography Images Generated from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans Using Various Deep Learning Methods in the Planning of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Yoo, Gyu Sang
    Luu, Huan Minh
    Kim, Heejung
    Park, Won
    Pyo, Hongryull
    Han, Youngyih
    Park, Ju Young
    Park, Sung-Hong
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [42] COMPARISON OF RADIODIAGNOSTIC METHODS (CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY, LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING) WITH SELECTED MARKERS OF BONE METABOLISM AND BONE MARROW MICROENVIRONMENT
    Krhovska, P.
    Hermanova, Z.
    Hrbek, J.
    Herman, M.
    Petrova, P.
    Zapletalova, J.
    Pika, T.
    Bacovsky, J.
    Minarik, J.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2018, 103 : 26 - 26
  • [43] Comparison of Radiodiagnostic Methods (Conventional Radiography, Low-Dose Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging) With Selected Markers of Bone Metabolism and Bone Marrow Microenvironment
    Krhovska, Petra
    Minarik, Jiri
    Pika, Tomas
    Bacovsky, Jaroslav
    Hrbek, Jan
    Proskova, Jitka
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2019, 19 (10): : E191 - E191
  • [44] Ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging developed by the SAR Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and the ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Working Group
    Shinagare, Atul B.
    Sadowski, Elizabeth A.
    Park, Hyesun
    Brook, Olga R.
    Forstner, Rosemarie
    Wallace, Sumer K.
    Horowitz, Jeanne M.
    Horowitz, Neil
    Javitt, Marcia
    Jha, Priyanka
    Kido, Aki
    Lakhman, Yulia
    Lee, Susanna, I
    Manganaro, Lucia
    Maturen, Katherine E.
    Nougaret, Stephanie
    Poder, Liina
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Reinhold, Caroline
    Sala, Evis
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Vargas, Herbert Alberto
    Venkatesan, Aradhana
    Nikolic, Olivera
    Rockall, Andrea G.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (05) : 3220 - 3235
  • [45] Ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging developed by the SAR Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and the ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Working Group
    Atul B. Shinagare
    Elizabeth A. Sadowski
    Hyesun Park
    Olga R. Brook
    Rosemarie Forstner
    Sumer K. Wallace
    Jeanne M. Horowitz
    Neil Horowitz
    Marcia Javitt
    Priyanka Jha
    Aki Kido
    Yulia Lakhman
    Susanna I. Lee
    Lucia Manganaro
    Katherine E. Maturen
    Stephanie Nougaret
    Liina Poder
    Gaiane M. Rauch
    Caroline Reinhold
    Evis Sala
    Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
    Herbert Alberto Vargas
    Aradhana Venkatesan
    Olivera Nikolic
    Andrea G. Rockall
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 3220 - 3235
  • [46] A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer
    Kobayashi, Ryutaro
    Uehara, Kay
    Ebata, Tomoki
    Yatsuya, Hiroshi
    Li, Yuanying
    Hida, Koya
    Hashiguchi, Yojiro
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    Ogawa, Shimpei
    Shiomi, Akio
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Ajioka, Yoichi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2025,
  • [47] Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability
    Marta Ponte
    Nuno Bettencourt
    Eulália Pereira
    Nuno Dias Ferreira
    Amedeo Chiribiri
    Andreas Schuster
    Aníbal Albuquerque
    Vasco Gama
    Eike Nagel
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2014, 30 : 1589 - 1597
  • [48] Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability
    Ponte, Marta
    Bettencourt, Nuno
    Pereira, Eulalia
    Ferreira, Nuno Dias
    Chiribiri, Amedeo
    Schuster, Andreas
    Albuquerque, Anibal
    Gama, Vasco
    Nagel, Eike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 30 (08): : 1589 - 1597
  • [49] Feasibility of artificial-intelligence-based synthetic computed tomography in a magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy workflow for brain radiotherapy: Two-way dose validation and 2D/2D kV-image-based positioning
    Masitho, Siti
    Szkitsak, Juliane
    Grigo, Johanna
    Fietkau, Rainer
    Putz, Florian
    Bert, Christoph
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 111 - 117
  • [50] Tumor Volumes Measured From Static and Dynamic 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scan: Comparison of Different Methods Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Criterion Standard
    Chen, Hanwei
    Jiang, Jinzhao
    Gao, Junling
    Liu, Dan
    Axelsson, Jan
    Cui, Minyi
    Gong, Nan-Jie
    Feng, Shi-Ting
    Luo, Liangping
    Huang, Bingsheng
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (02) : 209 - 215