Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting

被引:52
|
作者
Venta, LA
Hendrick, RE
Adler, YT
DeLeon, P
Mengoni, PM
Scharl, AM
Comstock, CE
Hansen, L
Kay, N
Coveler, A
Cutter, G
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Lynn Sage Comprehens Breast Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO 80214 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761241
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This study was performed to determine the rates and causes of disageements in interpretation between full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients undergoing diagnostic mammography were invited to participate in the digital mammography study. Three views, selected by the radiologist interpreting the film-screen-mammography, were obtained in both film-screen mammography and digital mammography Radiologists independently assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category to the film-screen mammography and the digital mammography images. The BI-RADS categories were grouped into the general categories of agreement, partial agreement or disagreement. A third and different radiologist reviewed all cases of disagreement, reached a decision as to management, and determined the primary: cause of disagreement. RESULTS. Six radiologists reviewed digital mammography and film-screen mammography diagnostic images in a total of 1147 breasts in 692 patients. Agreement between digital mammography and final film-screen mammography assessment was present in 937 breasts (82%), partial agreement in 159 (14%), and disagreement in 51 (4%), for a kappa value of 0.29. The primary causes of disagreement were differences in management approach of the radiologists (52%), inflammation derived from sonogaphy or additional film-screen mammograms (34%), and technical differences between the two mammographic techniques (10%). CONCLUSION. Significant disagreement between film-screen mammography and digital mammography affecting follow-up management was present in only 4% of breasts. The most frequent cause of disagreement in interpretation was a difference in management approach between radiologists (interobserver variability). This source of variability was larger than that due to differences in lesion visibility; between film-screen mammography and digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rate and causes of disagreement between full-field digital mammography and film screen mammography in a diagnostic setting
    Venta, LA
    Kay, NI
    Mengoni, PM
    Adler, YT
    Beam, CA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 322 - 322
  • [2] A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Michell, M. J.
    Iqbal, A.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Douiri, A.
    Wilson, R.
    Whelehan, P.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 976 - 981
  • [3] Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography:: image quality and lesion detection
    Fischmann, A
    Siegmann, KC
    Wersebe, A
    Claussen, CD
    Müller-Schimpfle, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (928): : 312 - 315
  • [4] Comparison of a new full-field digital mammography system and conventional film-screen mammography: A phantom study
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Marth, F
    Le Roux, A
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 152 - 152
  • [5] Contrast-detail-resolution of full-field digital mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Grebe, S
    Marth, F
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 627 - 632
  • [6] Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, S
    Bick, U
    von Heyden, H
    Diekmann, F
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2003, 175 (06): : 775 - 779
  • [7] Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, SD
    Von Heyden, H
    Bick, U
    Von Heyden, D
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Hamm, BK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 416 - 416
  • [8] Improved detection of low contrast objects with full-field digital mammography compared to film-screen mammography
    Niklason, LT
    OpsahlOng, B
    Landberg, C
    Castleberry, DE
    Venkatakrishnan, V
    Kopans, DB
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1249 - 1249
  • [9] Full-field digital mammography vs film-screen mammography in patients with microcalcifications: Comparison of detection and characterization
    Fischer, U
    Baum, FT
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Obenauer, S
    Von Heyden, D
    Grabbe, EH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 201 - 201
  • [10] Detection and characterization of microcalcification with film-screen and full-field digital mammography (FFDM)
    O'Riordan, E
    Bukhanov, K
    Wilson, C
    Sidlofsky, S
    Goldberg, F
    Muradali, D
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 200 - 200