Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sadeghpour, Alireza [1 ]
Ebrahimpour, Adel [2 ]
Attar, Bahamin [1 ]
Azizian, Zahra [3 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; autogenous graft; hamstring tendons; patellar tendons; SEMITENDINOSUS; GRAFTS; BONE;
D O I
10.4103/jrms.JRMS_939_16
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the patellar versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, fifty patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomized into two equal groups: Those treated with either autogenous patellar tendon grafts (PT group) or HT group grafts. All patients were reviewed immediately after surgery, at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and then at 6 months using the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form. Infection, severity of pain (visual analog scale), duration of rehabilitation, and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Positive pivot shift and Lachman test were considered clinical signs and symptoms of treatment failure. In addition, the absence of the ACL or transverse ACL rather than the posterior oblique ligament is an MRI finding that indicates treatment failure. Results: Comparing changes in pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients first and 6 months after therapy show that pain had been relief significantly (P < 0.001) and ROM dramatically changes (P < 0.001). The average rehabilitation period in the PT group was 13.2 +/- 2.08 weeks whereas in the HT group, it was 9.28 +/- 2.26 weeks. A significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the rehabilitation period (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the normal ROM between the groups (P = 0.32). When the pain severity was considered, a significant difference was found between the PT group and the HT group (P < 0.001). The HT group patients had less knee pain than did the PT group patients. No significant difference in infection rates was seen between two groups (P = 0.66). Conclusion: Considering the better outcomes of HT reconstructions for the two parameters of pain severity and rehabilitation period, we consider HTs to be the ideal graft choice for ACL reconstructions.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament - A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft
    Corry, IS
    Webb, JM
    Clingeleffer, AJ
    Pinczewski, LA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04): : 444 - 454
  • [42] ARTHROSCOPIC AND HISTOLOGIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN PATELLAR TENDON AUTOGRAFTS USED FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    ROUGRAFF, B
    SHELBOURNE, KD
    GERTH, PK
    WARNER, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (02): : 277 - 284
  • [43] A meta-analysis of hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Li, ShuZhen
    Su, Wei
    Zhao, Jinmin
    Xu, Yinglong
    Bo, Zhandong
    Ding, Xiaofei
    Wei, Qingjun
    KNEE, 2011, 18 (05): : 287 - 293
  • [44] Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis
    Biau, DJ
    Tournoux, C
    Katsahian, S
    Schranz, PJ
    Nizard, RS
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7548): : 995 - 998
  • [45] Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts
    Poehling-Monaghan, Kirsten L.
    Salem, Hytham
    Ross, Kirsten E.
    Secrist, Eric
    Ciccotti, Michael C.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Freedman, Kevin B.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (06)
  • [46] The Statistical Fragility of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies
    Ehlers, Cooper B.
    Curley, Andrew J.
    Fackler, Nathan P.
    Minhas, Arjun
    Chang, Edward S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (10): : 2827 - 2833
  • [47] Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players
    Betoni Guglielmetti, Luiz Gabriel
    Roman Salas, Victor Eduardo
    Jorge, Pedro Baches
    Severino, Fabricio Roberto
    Duarte, Aires
    de Oliveira, Victor Marques
    Leite Cury, Ricardo de Paula
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [48] A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Pinczewski, LA
    Deehan, DJ
    Salmon, LJ
    Russell, VJ
    Clingeleffer, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (04): : 523 - 536
  • [49] Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Forster, MC
    Forster, IW
    KNEE, 2005, 12 (03): : 225 - 230
  • [50] Clinical comparison of fixation methods for patellar bone quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Gorschewsky, Ottmar
    Stapf, Robert
    Geiser, Laurent
    Geitner, Ulrich
    Neumann, Wolfram
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (12): : 2118 - 2125