Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sadeghpour, Alireza [1 ]
Ebrahimpour, Adel [2 ]
Attar, Bahamin [1 ]
Azizian, Zahra [3 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; autogenous graft; hamstring tendons; patellar tendons; SEMITENDINOSUS; GRAFTS; BONE;
D O I
10.4103/jrms.JRMS_939_16
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the patellar versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, fifty patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomized into two equal groups: Those treated with either autogenous patellar tendon grafts (PT group) or HT group grafts. All patients were reviewed immediately after surgery, at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and then at 6 months using the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form. Infection, severity of pain (visual analog scale), duration of rehabilitation, and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Positive pivot shift and Lachman test were considered clinical signs and symptoms of treatment failure. In addition, the absence of the ACL or transverse ACL rather than the posterior oblique ligament is an MRI finding that indicates treatment failure. Results: Comparing changes in pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients first and 6 months after therapy show that pain had been relief significantly (P < 0.001) and ROM dramatically changes (P < 0.001). The average rehabilitation period in the PT group was 13.2 +/- 2.08 weeks whereas in the HT group, it was 9.28 +/- 2.26 weeks. A significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the rehabilitation period (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the normal ROM between the groups (P = 0.32). When the pain severity was considered, a significant difference was found between the PT group and the HT group (P < 0.001). The HT group patients had less knee pain than did the PT group patients. No significant difference in infection rates was seen between two groups (P = 0.66). Conclusion: Considering the better outcomes of HT reconstructions for the two parameters of pain severity and rehabilitation period, we consider HTs to be the ideal graft choice for ACL reconstructions.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of tibial rotation strength in patients' status after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring versus patellar tendon autografts
    Torry, MR
    Decker, MJ
    Jockel, JR
    Viola, R
    Sterett, WI
    Steadman, JR
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2004, 14 (06): : 325 - 331
  • [32] Isokinetic assesment with two years follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendons
    Condouret, J.
    Cohn, J.
    Ferret, J. -M.
    Lemonsu, A.
    Vasconcelos, W.
    Dejour, D.
    Potel, J. -F.
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2008, 94 (08): : S375 - S382
  • [33] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon: A Prospective Comparative Study With 9-Year Follow-Up
    Wipfler, Benjamin
    Donner, Stefanie
    Zechmann, Christian M.
    Springer, Jan
    Siebold, Rainer
    Paessler, Hans Heinrich
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (05): : 653 - 665
  • [34] Comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized study
    Stanczak, Katarzyna
    Zielinska, Marzenna
    Synder, Marek
    Domzalski, Marcin
    Polguj, Michal
    Sibinski, Marcin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (02) : 785 - 791
  • [35] Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Mean Follow-up of 15 Years
    Hoge, Connor G.
    Matar, Robert N.
    Khalil, Lafi S.
    Buchan, John A.
    Johnson, Cole M.
    Grawe, Brian M.
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2022, 10 (04): : 311 - 319
  • [36] Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Hamstring versus patellar tendon
    Carter, TR
    Edinger, S
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1999, 15 (02): : 169 - 172
  • [37] A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Li, Shuzhen
    Chen, Yueping
    Lin, Zonghan
    Cui, Wei
    Zhao, Jingmin
    Su, Wei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1287 - 1297
  • [38] A comparison of autogenous patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Dopirak, RM
    Adamany, DC
    Steensen, RN
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 27 (08) : 837 - 842
  • [39] A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Shuzhen Li
    Yueping Chen
    Zonghan Lin
    Wei Cui
    Jingmin Zhao
    Wei Su
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1287 - 1297
  • [40] Simultaneous Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Using Hamstring and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts
    Lo, Yang-Pin
    Hsu, Kuo-Yao
    Chen, Lih-Huei
    Wang, Ching-Jen
    Yeh, Wen-Ling
    Chan, Yi-Sheng
    Chen, Wen-Jer
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 66 (03): : 780 - 788