Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sadeghpour, Alireza [1 ]
Ebrahimpour, Adel [2 ]
Attar, Bahamin [1 ]
Azizian, Zahra [3 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; autogenous graft; hamstring tendons; patellar tendons; SEMITENDINOSUS; GRAFTS; BONE;
D O I
10.4103/jrms.JRMS_939_16
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the patellar versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, fifty patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomized into two equal groups: Those treated with either autogenous patellar tendon grafts (PT group) or HT group grafts. All patients were reviewed immediately after surgery, at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and then at 6 months using the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form. Infection, severity of pain (visual analog scale), duration of rehabilitation, and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Positive pivot shift and Lachman test were considered clinical signs and symptoms of treatment failure. In addition, the absence of the ACL or transverse ACL rather than the posterior oblique ligament is an MRI finding that indicates treatment failure. Results: Comparing changes in pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients first and 6 months after therapy show that pain had been relief significantly (P < 0.001) and ROM dramatically changes (P < 0.001). The average rehabilitation period in the PT group was 13.2 +/- 2.08 weeks whereas in the HT group, it was 9.28 +/- 2.26 weeks. A significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the rehabilitation period (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the normal ROM between the groups (P = 0.32). When the pain severity was considered, a significant difference was found between the PT group and the HT group (P < 0.001). The HT group patients had less knee pain than did the PT group patients. No significant difference in infection rates was seen between two groups (P = 0.66). Conclusion: Considering the better outcomes of HT reconstructions for the two parameters of pain severity and rehabilitation period, we consider HTs to be the ideal graft choice for ACL reconstructions.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Similar Femoral and Tibial Fixation Methods
    Taylor, Dean C.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    Nelson, Bradley J.
    Duffey, Michele
    Tenuta, Joachim
    Stoneman, Paul D.
    Sturdivant, Rodney X.
    Mountcastle, Sally
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (10): : 1946 - 1957
  • [22] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autografts. A comparative study at one year follow-up
    Katabi, M
    Djian, P
    Christel, P
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2002, 88 (02): : 139 - 148
  • [24] Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male and female athletes using the patellar tendon and hamstring autografts
    Alberto Gobbi
    Marcin Domzalski
    Jose Pascual
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2004, 12 : 534 - 539
  • [25] Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft
    Barrett, GR
    Noojin, FK
    Hartzog, CW
    Nash, CR
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (01): : 46 - 54
  • [26] Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male and female athletes using the patellar tendon and hamstring autografts
    Gobbi, A
    Domzalski, M
    Pascual, J
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2004, 12 (06) : 534 - 539
  • [27] Patellar tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: appraisal of the evidence
    Calvisi, V.
    Lupparelli, S.
    Padua, R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2006, 7 (02) : 103 - 107
  • [28] Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar tendon for chronic laxity: follow-up of 69 cases
    Tudisco, C
    Blasucci, C
    Simonelli, M
    Gatti, S
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1997, 19 (04): : 198 - 209
  • [29] Tunnel enlargement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts
    Murat Ali Hersekli
    Sercan Akpinar
    Metin Ozalay
    Gurkan Ozkoc
    Necip Cesur
    Mustafa Uysal
    Aysin Pourbagher
    Reha N. Tandogan
    Advances in Therapy, 2004, 21 : 123 - 131
  • [30] Tunnel enlargement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts
    Hersekli, MA
    Akpinar, S
    Ozalay, M
    Ozkoc, G
    Cesur, N
    Uysal, M
    Pourbagher, A
    Tandogan, RN
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2004, 21 (02) : 123 - 131