Comparison of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 6-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Sadeghpour, Alireza [1 ]
Ebrahimpour, Adel [2 ]
Attar, Bahamin [1 ]
Azizian, Zahra [3 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Shohada Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; autogenous graft; hamstring tendons; patellar tendons; SEMITENDINOSUS; GRAFTS; BONE;
D O I
10.4103/jrms.JRMS_939_16
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the patellar versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, fifty patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were randomized into two equal groups: Those treated with either autogenous patellar tendon grafts (PT group) or HT group grafts. All patients were reviewed immediately after surgery, at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and then at 6 months using the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form. Infection, severity of pain (visual analog scale), duration of rehabilitation, and clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were assessed at the 6-month follow-up. Positive pivot shift and Lachman test were considered clinical signs and symptoms of treatment failure. In addition, the absence of the ACL or transverse ACL rather than the posterior oblique ligament is an MRI finding that indicates treatment failure. Results: Comparing changes in pain and range of motion (ROM) in patients first and 6 months after therapy show that pain had been relief significantly (P < 0.001) and ROM dramatically changes (P < 0.001). The average rehabilitation period in the PT group was 13.2 +/- 2.08 weeks whereas in the HT group, it was 9.28 +/- 2.26 weeks. A significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the rehabilitation period (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the normal ROM between the groups (P = 0.32). When the pain severity was considered, a significant difference was found between the PT group and the HT group (P < 0.001). The HT group patients had less knee pain than did the PT group patients. No significant difference in infection rates was seen between two groups (P = 0.66). Conclusion: Considering the better outcomes of HT reconstructions for the two parameters of pain severity and rehabilitation period, we consider HTs to be the ideal graft choice for ACL reconstructions.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts
    Freedman, KB
    D'Amato, MJ
    Nedeff, DD
    Kaz, A
    Bach, BR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01): : 2 - 11
  • [2] A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Jansson, KA
    Linko, E
    Sandelin, J
    Harilainen, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (01): : 12 - 18
  • [3] Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 15-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Webster, Kate E.
    Feller, Julian A.
    Hartnett, Nigel
    Leigh, Warren B.
    Richmond, Anneka K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (01): : 83 - 90
  • [4] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts
    Rainer Siebold
    Kate E. Webster
    Julian A. Feller
    Alasdair G. Sutherland
    Johanna Elliott
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2006, 14 : 1070 - 1076
  • [5] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts
    Siebold, Rainer
    Webster, Kate E.
    Feller, Julian A.
    Sutherland, Alasdair G.
    Elliott, Johanna
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (11) : 1070 - 1076
  • [6] A Randomized Controlled Trial With Mean 16-Year Follow-up Comparing Hamstring and Patellar Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Bjoernsson, Haukur
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    Sundemo, David
    Desai, Neel
    Sernert, Ninni
    Rostgard-Christensen, Lars
    Karlsson, Jon
    Kartus, Jueri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (09): : 2304 - 2313
  • [7] A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Feller, JA
    Webster, KE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (04): : 564 - 573
  • [8] A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Five-year follow-up
    Sajovic, Matjaz
    Vengust, Vilibald
    Komadina, Radko
    Tavcar, Rok
    Skaza, Katja
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12): : 1933 - 1940
  • [9] Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autografts
    Nedeff, DD
    Bach, BR
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 25 (03) : 343 - 357
  • [10] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Female Athletes: Patellar Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts
    Salem, Hytham S.
    Varzhapetyan, Vahe
    Patel, Nimit
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
    Freedman, Kevin B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (09): : 2086 - 2092