Frailty, Physical Activity, and Mobility in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices

被引:29
|
作者
Kramer, Daniel B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tsai, Timothy [1 ]
Natarajan, Poorna [2 ,3 ]
Tewksbury, Elise [2 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Susan L. [1 ,2 ]
Travison, Thomas G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew SeniorLife Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Richard & Susan Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
aging; defibrillation; pacemaker; physical exercise; LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION; GAIT SPEED; OLDER-ADULTS; DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; GO TEST; DISABILITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.116.004659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring frailty in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices while validating the physiologic significance of device-detected physical activity by evaluating its association with frailty and mobility. Methods and Results: Outpatients with cardiac implantable electrical devices compatible with physical activity analysis with at least 7 days of data were eligible. Office testing included frailty status (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures instrument), gait speed (m/s), mobility according to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (seconds), and daily physical activity (h/d) as measured by cardiac implantable electrical device. Among 219 patients, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures testing found 39.7% to be robust, 47.5% prefrail, and 12.8% frail. The mean gait speed for the cohort was 0.8 +/- 0.3 m/s, mean TUG time was 10.9 +/- 4.4 seconds, and mean activity was 2.8 +/- 1.9 h/d. Frail patients were markedly more likely to have gait speeds < 0.8 m/s (OR 6.25, 95% CI 1.79-33.3). In unadjusted analyses each 1-hour increase in mean daily activity was associated with a 46% reduction of frail phenotype (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.74) versus robust and with a 27% reduction in the odds of having the prefrail phenotype (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86). After adjustment this association per hour of activity persisted, with an adjusted OR for frailty of 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.99) and adjusted OR for prefrailty of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.99). Conclusions: Frailty and mobility limitation are common among cardiac implantable electrical device patients and are correlated to device-detected physical activity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of a physical activity intervention and frailty on frailty trajectory and major mobility disability
    Quach, Jack
    Theou, Olga
    Perez-Zepeda, Mario U.
    Godin, Judith
    Rockwood, Kenneth
    Kehler, Dustin S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (10) : 2915 - 2924
  • [32] Comparative Analysis of Physical Activity Detected via an External Accelerometer and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Chen, Chun-Kai
    Cheng, Li-Ying
    Hsu, Shan-Wei
    Liao, Min-Tsun
    Ku, Po-Wen
    Liu, Yen-Bin
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [33] The impacts of preoperative frailty on readmission after cardiac implantable electrical device implantation
    Takeda, Tomonori
    Tsubaki, Atsuhiro
    Ikeda, Yoshifumi
    Kato, Ritsushi
    Hotta, Kazuki
    Inoue, Tatsuro
    Kojima, Sho
    Kanai, Risa
    Terazaki, Yoshitaka
    Uchida, Ryusei
    Makita, Shigeru
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (11):
  • [34] Sudden cardiac arrest in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Sharifzadehgan, A.
    Bougouin, W.
    Narayanan, K.
    Dumas, F.
    Waldmann, V.
    Gandjbakhch, E.
    Aissaoui, N.
    Algalarrondo, V.
    Extramiana, F.
    Lellouche, N.
    Cariou, A.
    Jouven, X.
    Marijon, E.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 213 - 213
  • [35] Cyber-Physical Modeling of Implantable Cardiac Medical Devices
    Jiang, Zhihao
    Pajic, Miroslav
    Mangharam, Rahul
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2012, 100 (01) : 122 - 137
  • [36] Management of cardiac electrical implantable devices in patients nearing the end of life or requesting withdrawal of therapy
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    Ottenberg, Abigale L.
    Mueer, Paul S.
    POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 120 (12): : 497 - 501
  • [37] Arrhythmias in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices after Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Rosenbaum, Andrew N.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Duval, Sue
    Sakaguchi, Scott
    John, Ranjit
    Eckman, Peter M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [38] Ethical and Legal Views Regarding Deactivation of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    Salberg, Lisa
    Brock, Dan W.
    Maisel, William H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 107 (07): : 1071 - 1075
  • [39] EFFECTS OF EXERCISE TRAINING ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN HEART FAILURE PATIENTS TREATED WITH CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEVICES OR IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS
    Yanagi, Hidetoshi
    Konishi, Harumi
    Yamada, Saori
    Kitagaki, Kazufumi
    Nakanishi, Michio
    Harada, Taku
    Kohzuki, Masahiro
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2020, 52 (10)
  • [40] Impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on activity minutes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Peigh, Graham
    Stanelle, Evan
    Ziegler, Paul D.
    Varberg, Nathan
    Soderlund, Dana
    Passman, Rod S.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (09) : 1405 - 1411