Frailty, Physical Activity, and Mobility in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices

被引:29
|
作者
Kramer, Daniel B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tsai, Timothy [1 ]
Natarajan, Poorna [2 ,3 ]
Tewksbury, Elise [2 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Susan L. [1 ,2 ]
Travison, Thomas G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew SeniorLife Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Richard & Susan Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
aging; defibrillation; pacemaker; physical exercise; LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION; GAIT SPEED; OLDER-ADULTS; DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; GO TEST; DISABILITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.116.004659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring frailty in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices while validating the physiologic significance of device-detected physical activity by evaluating its association with frailty and mobility. Methods and Results: Outpatients with cardiac implantable electrical devices compatible with physical activity analysis with at least 7 days of data were eligible. Office testing included frailty status (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures instrument), gait speed (m/s), mobility according to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (seconds), and daily physical activity (h/d) as measured by cardiac implantable electrical device. Among 219 patients, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures testing found 39.7% to be robust, 47.5% prefrail, and 12.8% frail. The mean gait speed for the cohort was 0.8 +/- 0.3 m/s, mean TUG time was 10.9 +/- 4.4 seconds, and mean activity was 2.8 +/- 1.9 h/d. Frail patients were markedly more likely to have gait speeds < 0.8 m/s (OR 6.25, 95% CI 1.79-33.3). In unadjusted analyses each 1-hour increase in mean daily activity was associated with a 46% reduction of frail phenotype (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.74) versus robust and with a 27% reduction in the odds of having the prefrail phenotype (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86). After adjustment this association per hour of activity persisted, with an adjusted OR for frailty of 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.99) and adjusted OR for prefrailty of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.99). Conclusions: Frailty and mobility limitation are common among cardiac implantable electrical device patients and are correlated to device-detected physical activity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sport activity in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: evidence and perspectives
    Sciarra, Luigi
    Salustri, Elisa
    Petroni, Renata
    Calo, Leonardo
    Delise, Pietro
    Penco, Maria
    Romano, Silvio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (05) : 335 - 343
  • [22] Remote interrogation and reprogramming for cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Clarke, John-Ross D.
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 20 (04) : 552 - 553
  • [23] Physical activity measured by cardiac devices predicts frailty, hospitalisation and death in older people
    Taylor, J. K.
    Greenstein, A.
    Peek, N.
    Ahmed, F. Z.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2022, 236 : 371 - 374
  • [24] Cardiac MRI for Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Stojanovska, Jadranka
    Runge, Mason
    Mahani, Maryam Ghadimi
    Cronin, Paul P.
    Sayyouh, Mohamed
    Bogun, Frank
    Ibrahim, El-Sayed H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (02) : 374 - 381
  • [25] Lockdown measures for COVID-19 outbreak and variation in physical activity in patients with heart failure and cardiac implantable devices
    Cunha, Pedro Silva
    Laranjo, Sergio
    Lourenco, Andre
    Rodrigues, Lourenco
    Cardoso, Isabel
    Portugal, Guilherme
    Valente, Bruno
    Delgado, Ana Sofia
    Ferreira, Rui Cruz
    Abreu, Ana
    Oliveira, Mario Martins
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2021, 37
  • [26] Capacity of dental equipment to interfere with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Lahor-Soler, Eduard
    Miranda-Rius, Jaume
    Brunet-Llobet, Lluis
    Sabate de la Cruz, Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2015, 123 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [27] MRI of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Martinez, Jessica A.
    Ennis, Daniel B.
    CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING REPORTS, 2019, 12 (07)
  • [28] MRI in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Cronin, Edmond M.
    Mahon, Niall
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2012, 9 (02) : 139 - 146
  • [29] MRI in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Muthalaly, Rahul G.
    Nerlekar, Nitesh
    Ge, Yin
    Kwong, Raymond Y.
    Nasis, Arthur
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (02) : 281 - 292
  • [30] MRI of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Jessica A. Martinez
    Daniel B. Ennis
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2019, 12