Frailty, Physical Activity, and Mobility in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices

被引:29
|
作者
Kramer, Daniel B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tsai, Timothy [1 ]
Natarajan, Poorna [2 ,3 ]
Tewksbury, Elise [2 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Susan L. [1 ,2 ]
Travison, Thomas G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew SeniorLife Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Richard & Susan Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
aging; defibrillation; pacemaker; physical exercise; LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION; GAIT SPEED; OLDER-ADULTS; DEFIBRILLATOR IMPLANTATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; GO TEST; DISABILITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.116.004659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring frailty in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices while validating the physiologic significance of device-detected physical activity by evaluating its association with frailty and mobility. Methods and Results: Outpatients with cardiac implantable electrical devices compatible with physical activity analysis with at least 7 days of data were eligible. Office testing included frailty status (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures instrument), gait speed (m/s), mobility according to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (seconds), and daily physical activity (h/d) as measured by cardiac implantable electrical device. Among 219 patients, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures testing found 39.7% to be robust, 47.5% prefrail, and 12.8% frail. The mean gait speed for the cohort was 0.8 +/- 0.3 m/s, mean TUG time was 10.9 +/- 4.4 seconds, and mean activity was 2.8 +/- 1.9 h/d. Frail patients were markedly more likely to have gait speeds < 0.8 m/s (OR 6.25, 95% CI 1.79-33.3). In unadjusted analyses each 1-hour increase in mean daily activity was associated with a 46% reduction of frail phenotype (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.74) versus robust and with a 27% reduction in the odds of having the prefrail phenotype (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86). After adjustment this association per hour of activity persisted, with an adjusted OR for frailty of 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.99) and adjusted OR for prefrailty of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.99). Conclusions: Frailty and mobility limitation are common among cardiac implantable electrical device patients and are correlated to device-detected physical activity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Cinzia Valzania
    Rachele Bonfiglioli
    Francesco Fallani
    Cristian Martignani
    Matteo Ziacchi
    Igor Diemberger
    Mauro Biffi
    Stefano Fanti
    Nazzareno Galiè
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022, 29 : 633 - 641
  • [12] Single-photon cardiac imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Valzania, Cinzia
    Bonfiglioli, Rachele
    Fallani, Francesco
    Martignani, Cristian
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Diemberger, Igor
    Biffi, Mauro
    Fanti, Stefano
    Galie, Nazzareno
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (02) : 633 - 641
  • [13] Validity of cardiac implantable electronic devices in assessing daily physical activity
    Pressler, Axel
    Danner, Michael
    Esefeld, Katrin
    Haller, Bernhard
    Scherr, Johannes
    Schoemig, Albert
    Halle, Martin
    Kolb, Christof
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 168 (02) : 1127 - 1130
  • [14] Clinical utility of remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Yang, Shu
    Stabenau, Hans F.
    Kiernan, Katherine
    Diamond, Jamie E.
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (04) : 961 - 969
  • [15] Clinical utility of remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Shu Yang
    Hans F. Stabenau
    Katherine Kiernan
    Jamie E. Diamond
    Daniel B. Kramer
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 961 - 969
  • [16] Comparative effectiveness of cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    Hatfield, Laura A.
    Normand, Sharon-Lise T.
    HEART, 2015, 101 (22) : 1773 - 1775
  • [17] Future of implantable electrical cardiac devices DISCUSSION
    Vacheron, Andre
    Lecomte, Dominique
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2014, 198 (03): : 487 - 488
  • [18] New aspects of implantable electrical cardiac devices
    Israel, Carsten W.
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    HERZ, 2021, 46 (06) : 497 - 498
  • [19] External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter in patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices
    Elgaard, Anders Fyhn
    Dinesen, Pia Thisted
    Riahi, Sam
    Hansen, John
    Lundbye-Christensen, Soren
    Thogersen, Anna Margrethe
    Larsen, Jacob Moesgaard
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (02): : 108 - 113
  • [20] TIMING OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION OCCURRENCE IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRICAL DEVICES
    Kida, Hirota
    Kikuchi, Yoshitaka
    Sato, Nobuhiroo
    Kawasaki, Masato
    Watanabe, Tetsuya
    Yamada, Takahisa
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I843 - I844