Single-center retrospective review of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

被引:14
|
作者
Lu, Tony [1 ]
Loh, Thomas M. [1 ]
El-Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
Davies, Mark G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, 6550 Fannin St,Smith Tower,Suite 1401, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Dis & Surg, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
EKOS; CDT; thrombolysis; ultrasound; outcomes; DVT; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; VEIN THROMBOSIS; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/1708538117702061
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: Systemic anticoagulation remains the standard for acute lower extremity (LE) deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but growing interest in catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its potential to reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) has led to advent of ultrasound-accelerated CDT (US-CDT). Few studies to date have examined the outcomes of US-CDT against traditional CDT (T-CDT). Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center review of all patients treated for acute LE DVT over a five-year period with either US-and T-CDT. Patients were stratified based on demographics, presentation, co-morbidities, risk factors, and peri-procedural data. Results: Seventy-six limbs in 67 patients were treated; 51 limbs in 42 patients were treated with US-CDT, and 25 limbs in 25 patients were treated with T-CDT. Adjuncts include: pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (n = 28 vs. 20, p = 0.04), angioplasty (n = 22 vs. 18, p = 0.11), stenting (n = 30 vs. 6, p <= 0.001), and IVC filter insertion (n = 5 vs. 0, p = 0.07). Mean lysis times were 21 +/- 1.7 and 24 +/- 1.8 h for US-and T-CDT, respectively (p = 0.26). Thirty (25 ultrasound, 5 traditional) limbs had complete lysis. Thirty-one (22 ultrasound, 9 traditional) limbs had incomplete lysis. Fifteen (4 ultrasound, 11 traditional) limbs had ineffective lysis (p = 0.002 in favor of ultrasound). Four patients (3 US-CDT, 1 T-CDT) had recurrent ipsilateral thrombosis within 30 days (p = 0.60). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no significant difference between primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, re-thrombosis, and recurrent symptoms at 6, 12, and 24 months. Conclusion: US-CDT does not significantly improve mid-term patencies but results in greater acute clot burden reduction in patients with acute LE DVTs compared to T-CDT, which may be beneficial in reducing the long-term incidence of PTS.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis
    Strijkers, Rob H. W.
    Grommes, Jochen
    Arnoldussen, Carsten W. K. P.
    de Graaf, Rick
    ten Cate, Arina J.
    Witten, Cees H. A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2013, 1 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [2] Efficacy of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis in treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Shan
    Zhao, Zhizhen
    Song, Zhijun
    Wang, Li
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (27)
  • [3] Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the management of postpartum deep venous thrombosis
    Dumantepe, Mert
    Tarhan, Ibrahim Arif
    Yurdakul, Ilhan
    Ozler, Azmi
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (05) : 1065 - 1069
  • [4] A Retrospective Comparison of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Tian, Yu
    Huang, Zhiyong
    Luo, Kunhui
    Zhang, Ning
    Yuan, Biao
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 : 306 - 314
  • [5] A systematic review of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis
    Shi, Yadong
    Shi, Wanyin
    Chen, Liang
    Gu, Jianping
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2018, 45 (03) : 440 - 451
  • [6] A systematic review of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis
    Yadong Shi
    Wanyin Shi
    Liang Chen
    Jianping Gu
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2018, 45 : 440 - 451
  • [7] Safety and Feasibility of Ultrasound-accelerated Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Grommes, J.
    Strijkers, R.
    Greiner, A.
    Mahnken, A. H.
    Wittens, C. H. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (04) : 526 - 532
  • [8] Ultrasound-accelerated, Catheter-directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of LVAD Thrombosis
    Cole, R. T.
    Clermont, E. C.
    Gupta, D.
    Jokhadar, M.
    Millard, M.
    McTeague, K.
    Babaliaros, V.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S32 - S32
  • [9] Ultrasound-Accelerated, Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Single-Center Retrospective Review with Intermediate-Term Outcomes
    Makary, Mina S.
    Fogler, Brian D.
    Dube, Priyanka P.
    Flanders, Vince L.
    Natarajan, Kannan
    Garcia-Cortes, Rafael
    Foster, Todd
    Dowell, Joshua D.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 438 - 443
  • [10] A new modality in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis
    Ozturk, Cuneyd
    Ozalp, Bilhan
    Ipeksoy, Umit
    Halici, Umit
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 22 (04): : 755 - 760