A Retrospective Comparison of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

被引:7
|
作者
Tian, Yu [1 ]
Huang, Zhiyong [2 ]
Luo, Kunhui [1 ]
Zhang, Ning [2 ]
Yuan, Biao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp 3, 47 Youyi Rd, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Dept Vasc Surg, Beijing Chao Yang Hosp, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
关键词
ANGIOJET RHEOLYTIC THROMBECTOMY; POSTTHROMBOTIC SYNDROME; VEIN THROMBOSIS; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; UROKINASE; ALTEPLASE; THERAPY; SAFETY; CAVENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are frequently employed for treating deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there have been relatively few studies comparing PMT outcomes to those associated with CDT. The present study was thus designed to compare short-and mid-term PMT and CDT patient outcomes following the treatment of DVT of the lower extremities. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 98 patients treated at the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen, China) and Beijing Chao Yang Hospital (Beijing, China). All patients had undergone treatment for symptomatic DVT of the lower legs via either CDT or PMT. Clinical records and outcome data between the patients in these 2 treatment groups were compared. Results: Of the 98 patients analyzed in this retrospective study, 50 had been treated via CDT while 48 had undergone PMT. These PMT and CDT operations were associated with mean treatment durations of 0.97 +/- 0.20 hr and 32.48 +/- 7.46 hr, respectively ( P < 0.0001). Complete lysis was achieved in 78 patients (42 and 36 in the PMT and CDT groups, respectively P = 0.057), while effective lysis was achieved in 96 patients (48 and 48 in the PMT and CDT groups, respectively P = 0.162), with lysis being ineffective in the 2 remaining patients. PMT was associated with a significantly decreased length of hospital stay, usage of UK dose, and treatment duration relative to CDT(P < 0.0001). No major complications or MACE incidence were noted in either group, although 18 patients in the PMT group suffered from bradyarrhythmia ( P = 0.007). Clinical efficacy was achieved in 96 patients (48 in each treatment group) at time of discharge ( P = 0.162). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that 2-year primary patency rates did not differ significantly between these 2 groups ( P = 0.442). Conclusion: PMT is an effective treatment modality in patients with symptomatic DVT. Relative to CDT it is associated with high treatment success rates, reduced treatment duration, and reduced hospitalization duration, although it is also associated with higher rates of systemic complications.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 314
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Retrospective Study Comparing Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Min, XiXi
    Chen, Wei
    Zeng, Xiong
    Zeng, Xiande
    Zhu, Xianhua
    Dai, KangHui
    Ju, ZhiNan
    Zhou, WeiMin
    Qiu, Jiehua
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 104 : 307 - 314
  • [2] Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Tawfik, Ahmad M.
    Zaidan, Mohamed H.
    Sorour, Waleed A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (01): : 228 - 238
  • [3] Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
    Kang, Tao
    Lu, Yao-Liang
    Han, Song
    Li, Xiao-Qiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [4] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis
    Comerota, AJ
    Kagan, SA
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2000, 15 (3-4) : 149 - 155
  • [5] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy for Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Mahmoud, Osman
    Vikatmaa, Pirkka
    Rasanen, Jari
    Peltola, Erno
    Sihvo, Eero
    Vikatmaa, Leena
    Lappalainen, Kimmo
    Venermo, Maarit
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 51 : 246 - 253
  • [6] Comparison of AngioJet Thrombectomy System Versus Suction Catheter with the Adjunct of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Guo, Hui
    Gan, Hai-run
    Zhang, Yong-yu
    Wang, Da-shuai
    He, Jia-nan
    Zhao, Ni
    Huang, Wei-le
    Pang, Peng-fei
    [J]. SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2023, 30 (04) : 445 - 454
  • [7] Catheter-directed pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for the management of deep vein thrombosis
    Klopotowski, Mariusz
    [J]. POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2011, 7 (04): : 311 - 316
  • [8] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis of Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Oklu, Rahmi
    Wicky, Stephan
    [J]. SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2013, 39 (04): : 446 - 451
  • [9] Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis
    Vedantham, S.
    Goldhaber, S. Z.
    Julian, J. A.
    Kahn, S. R.
    Jaff, M. R.
    Cohen, D. J.
    Magnuson, E.
    Razavi, M. K.
    Comerota, A. J.
    Gornik, H. L.
    Murphy, T. P.
    Lewis, L.
    Duncan, J. R.
    Nieters, P.
    Derfler, M. C.
    Filion, M.
    Gu, C. -S.
    Kee, S.
    Schneider, J.
    Saad, N.
    Blinder, M.
    Moll, S.
    Sacks, D.
    Lin, J.
    Rundback, J.
    Garcia, M.
    Razdan, R.
    VanderWoude, E.
    Marques, V.
    Kearon, C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (23): : 2240 - 2252
  • [10] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Liu, Fang
    Lue, Ping
    Jin, Bi
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 25 (05) : 707 - 715