Single-center retrospective review of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

被引:14
|
作者
Lu, Tony [1 ]
Loh, Thomas M. [1 ]
El-Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
Davies, Mark G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, 6550 Fannin St,Smith Tower,Suite 1401, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Dis & Surg, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
EKOS; CDT; thrombolysis; ultrasound; outcomes; DVT; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; VEIN THROMBOSIS; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/1708538117702061
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: Systemic anticoagulation remains the standard for acute lower extremity (LE) deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but growing interest in catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its potential to reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) has led to advent of ultrasound-accelerated CDT (US-CDT). Few studies to date have examined the outcomes of US-CDT against traditional CDT (T-CDT). Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center review of all patients treated for acute LE DVT over a five-year period with either US-and T-CDT. Patients were stratified based on demographics, presentation, co-morbidities, risk factors, and peri-procedural data. Results: Seventy-six limbs in 67 patients were treated; 51 limbs in 42 patients were treated with US-CDT, and 25 limbs in 25 patients were treated with T-CDT. Adjuncts include: pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (n = 28 vs. 20, p = 0.04), angioplasty (n = 22 vs. 18, p = 0.11), stenting (n = 30 vs. 6, p <= 0.001), and IVC filter insertion (n = 5 vs. 0, p = 0.07). Mean lysis times were 21 +/- 1.7 and 24 +/- 1.8 h for US-and T-CDT, respectively (p = 0.26). Thirty (25 ultrasound, 5 traditional) limbs had complete lysis. Thirty-one (22 ultrasound, 9 traditional) limbs had incomplete lysis. Fifteen (4 ultrasound, 11 traditional) limbs had ineffective lysis (p = 0.002 in favor of ultrasound). Four patients (3 US-CDT, 1 T-CDT) had recurrent ipsilateral thrombosis within 30 days (p = 0.60). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no significant difference between primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, re-thrombosis, and recurrent symptoms at 6, 12, and 24 months. Conclusion: US-CDT does not significantly improve mid-term patencies but results in greater acute clot burden reduction in patients with acute LE DVTs compared to T-CDT, which may be beneficial in reducing the long-term incidence of PTS.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized study of different approaches for catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower-extremity acute deep venous thrombosis
    Duan, Peng-Fei
    Ni, Cai-Fang
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 115 (08) : 652 - 657
  • [22] Efficacy of Catheter-directed Thrombolysis on Post-burn Deep Venous Thrombosis of Lower Extremity
    Gao, Guozheng
    Zhu, Shugang
    Xie, Zhen
    Wang, Jiasen
    Yao, Baohong
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2019, 29 (05): : 448 - 452
  • [23] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: Report of a national multicenter registry
    Mewissen, MW
    Seabrook, GR
    Meissner, MH
    Cynamon, J
    Labropoulos, N
    Haughton, SH
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [24] Comparison of AngioJet Thrombectomy System Versus Suction Catheter with the Adjunct of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Guo, Hui
    Gan, Hai-run
    Zhang, Yong-yu
    Wang, Da-shuai
    He, Jia-nan
    Zhao, Ni
    Huang, Wei-le
    Pang, Peng-fei
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2023, 30 (04) : 445 - 454
  • [25] Ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) versus standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of pulmonary embolism: A retrospective analysis
    Rothschild, Daniel P.
    Goldstein, James A.
    Ciacci, Joseph
    Bowers, Terry R.
    VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (03) : 234 - 240
  • [26] Ultrasound-Accelerated versus Standard Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in 102 Patients with Acute and Subacute Limb Ischemia
    Schernthaner, Melanie B.
    Samuels, Shaun
    Biegler, Peter
    Benenati, James F.
    Uthoff, Heiko
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (08) : 1149 - 1156
  • [27] US-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis
    Dumantepe, Mert
    Tarhan, Arif
    Yurdakul, Ilhan
    Ozler, Azmi
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [28] Use of Ultrasound-Accelerated, Catheter-Directed Local Thrombolysis for Venous and Arterial Occlusions in a Pediatric Hospital
    Khan, Asra
    Gowda, Srinath
    Parekh, Dhaval
    Qureshi, Athar M.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 30 (10): : 387 - 392
  • [29] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for symptomatic lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.
    Mewissen, MW
    Seabrook, GR
    Meissner, MH
    Haughton, SH
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 501A - 501A
  • [30] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis
    Comerota, AJ
    Kagan, SA
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2000, 15 (3-4) : 149 - 155