Single-center retrospective review of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis

被引:14
|
作者
Lu, Tony [1 ]
Loh, Thomas M. [1 ]
El-Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
Davies, Mark G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, 6550 Fannin St,Smith Tower,Suite 1401, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Dis & Surg, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
EKOS; CDT; thrombolysis; ultrasound; outcomes; DVT; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; VEIN THROMBOSIS; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/1708538117702061
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: Systemic anticoagulation remains the standard for acute lower extremity (LE) deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but growing interest in catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its potential to reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) has led to advent of ultrasound-accelerated CDT (US-CDT). Few studies to date have examined the outcomes of US-CDT against traditional CDT (T-CDT). Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center review of all patients treated for acute LE DVT over a five-year period with either US-and T-CDT. Patients were stratified based on demographics, presentation, co-morbidities, risk factors, and peri-procedural data. Results: Seventy-six limbs in 67 patients were treated; 51 limbs in 42 patients were treated with US-CDT, and 25 limbs in 25 patients were treated with T-CDT. Adjuncts include: pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (n = 28 vs. 20, p = 0.04), angioplasty (n = 22 vs. 18, p = 0.11), stenting (n = 30 vs. 6, p <= 0.001), and IVC filter insertion (n = 5 vs. 0, p = 0.07). Mean lysis times were 21 +/- 1.7 and 24 +/- 1.8 h for US-and T-CDT, respectively (p = 0.26). Thirty (25 ultrasound, 5 traditional) limbs had complete lysis. Thirty-one (22 ultrasound, 9 traditional) limbs had incomplete lysis. Fifteen (4 ultrasound, 11 traditional) limbs had ineffective lysis (p = 0.002 in favor of ultrasound). Four patients (3 US-CDT, 1 T-CDT) had recurrent ipsilateral thrombosis within 30 days (p = 0.60). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no significant difference between primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, re-thrombosis, and recurrent symptoms at 6, 12, and 24 months. Conclusion: US-CDT does not significantly improve mid-term patencies but results in greater acute clot burden reduction in patients with acute LE DVTs compared to T-CDT, which may be beneficial in reducing the long-term incidence of PTS.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 532
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Retrospective Study Comparing Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Min, XiXi
    Chen, Wei
    Zeng, Xiong
    Zeng, Xiande
    Zhu, Xianhua
    Dai, KangHui
    Ju, ZhiNan
    Zhou, WeiMin
    Qiu, Jiehua
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 104 : 307 - 314
  • [32] A Retrospective Study Comparing 2 Approaches to Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Wang, Haiyang
    Qi, Xiaotong
    Chen, Yikuan
    Sun, Jianming
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 50 : 30 - 37
  • [33] Comparison of Ultrasound-Accelerated versus Pigtail Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
    Graif, Assaf
    Grilli, Christopher J.
    Kimbiris, George
    Agriantonis, Demetrios J.
    Chohan, Omar Z.
    Fedele, Charles R.
    Gakhal, Mandip S.
    Vance, Ansar Z.
    Leung, Daniel A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) : 1339 - 1347
  • [34] Ultrasound-accelerated vs Standard Catheter-directed Thrombolysis-A Comparative Study in Patients with Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Baker, Reginald
    Samuels, Shaun
    Benenati, James F.
    Powell, Alex
    Uthoff, Heiko
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (11) : 1460 - 1466
  • [35] Cost Analysis of Trellis Device Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Rinker, Jacob H.
    Massop, Douglas
    Smith, Hayden L.
    Wall, Piper
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (04) : 1101 - 1102
  • [36] Catheter-directed thrombolysis with percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy versus thrombolysis alone in upper and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis
    Kim, Hyun S.
    Patra, Ajanta
    Paxton, Ben E.
    Khan, Jawad
    Streiff, Michael B.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 29 (06) : 1003 - 1007
  • [37] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis with Percutaneous Rheolytic Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolysis Alone in Upper and Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Hyun S. Kim
    Ajanta Patra
    Ben E. Paxton
    Jawad Khan
    Michael B. Streiff
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006, 29 : 1003 - 1007
  • [38] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a meta-analysis
    Wang Li
    Zhang Chuanlin
    Mu Shaoyu
    Chao Hsing Yeh
    Chen Liqun
    Zhang Zeju
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 26
  • [39] Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
    Shi, Hong-Jian
    Huang, You-Hua
    Shen, Tao
    Xu, Qiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (02) : 350 - 355
  • [40] Argatroban and t-PA During Catheter-Directed thrombolysis for Extensive lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Sharifi, Mohsen
    Freeman, Wilbur K.
    Chatham, Jean
    Emami, Tahereh
    Bay, Curt
    Schwartz, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B157 - B157