Reusable versus disposable instruments in tonsillectomy: A comparative study of outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Maheshwar, A [1 ]
De, M [1 ]
Browning, ST [1 ]
机构
[1] Singleton Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Swansea SA2 8QA, W Glam, Wales
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Tonsillectomy, traditionally performed using reusable instruments (Rls), has recently been performed using disposable instruments (Dls), to prevent the theoretical risk of spreading new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Following this, there have been concerns of increased risk of complications, especially haemorrhage. We audited our hospital's complication rates of 100 tonsillectomies performed using Rl and 100 using Dls. We analysed the overall complication rates and the postoperative haemorrhage rates. and compared them with the broader groups of Rls versus Dls. We also compared patients who did not have diathermy with those who did have diathermy. The overall complication rate was 6% with Rls and 33% with Dls and the haemorrhage rate was 1% and 12%, respectively With Dls, these rates were significantly higher in the diathermy subgroup. We believe this is the first study to look at the complications due to Dls.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 583
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: reusable and disposable instruments compared
    Mary-Louise Montague
    Michael S. W. Lee
    S. S. Musheer Hussain
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck, 2004, 261 : 225 - 228
  • [2] Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: reusable and disposable instruments compared
    Montague, ML
    Lee, MSW
    Hussain, SSM
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 261 (04) : 225 - 228
  • [3] DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    PAOLUCCI, V
    SCHAEFF, B
    GUTT, C
    MORAWE, G
    ENCKE, A
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1995, 120 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [4] Reducing the Cost of Laparoscopy: Reusable versus Disposable Laparoscopic Instruments
    Manatakis, Dimitrios K.
    Georgopoulos, Nikolaos
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2014, 2014
  • [5] DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY INSTRUMENTS - AN AUDIT OF COSTS
    WILKINSON, JM
    HARGRAVE, M
    HOSIE, KB
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY, 1995, 4 (04): : 211 - 214
  • [6] Comparative carbon footprinting study of reusable vs. disposable instruments in cataract surgery
    Mccance, Eleanor
    Steinbach, Ingeborg
    Morris, Daniel S.
    EYE, 2025,
  • [7] A warning to users of disposable tonsillectomy instruments
    Chicken, DW
    Sivaji, N
    Kanegaonkar, RG
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2001, 115 (08): : 686 - 686
  • [8] Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections
    Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed
    Winsloe, Sarah
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 137 (1600) : 62 - 65
  • [9] Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety
    Siu, Joey
    Hill, Andrew G.
    MacCormick, Andrew D.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (1-2) : 28 - 33
  • [10] DISPOSABLE OR REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    ENGERT, K
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1995, 120 (05): : 416 - 416