Reusable versus disposable instruments in tonsillectomy: A comparative study of outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Maheshwar, A [1 ]
De, M [1 ]
Browning, ST [1 ]
机构
[1] Singleton Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Swansea SA2 8QA, W Glam, Wales
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Tonsillectomy, traditionally performed using reusable instruments (Rls), has recently been performed using disposable instruments (Dls), to prevent the theoretical risk of spreading new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Following this, there have been concerns of increased risk of complications, especially haemorrhage. We audited our hospital's complication rates of 100 tonsillectomies performed using Rl and 100 using Dls. We analysed the overall complication rates and the postoperative haemorrhage rates. and compared them with the broader groups of Rls versus Dls. We also compared patients who did not have diathermy with those who did have diathermy. The overall complication rate was 6% with Rls and 33% with Dls and the haemorrhage rate was 1% and 12%, respectively With Dls, these rates were significantly higher in the diathermy subgroup. We believe this is the first study to look at the complications due to Dls.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 583
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy
    Kanchan Chaudhary
    Vishwambhar Singh
    Ramraj Yadav
    Ashvanee Kumar Chaudhary
    Rajesh Kumar
    Deepak Kumar Gupta
    Jyoti Kumar Verma
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2023, 75 : 2870 - 2877
  • [42] Ligation Versus Bipolar Diathermy for Hemostasis in Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study
    Karan Sharma
    Devinder Kumar
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2011, 63 : 15 - 19
  • [43] Comparative Study of Complications Associated with Coblation Versus Conventional Tonsillectomy
    Chaudhary, Kanchan
    Singh, Vishwambhar
    Yadav, Ramraj
    Chaudhary, Ashvanee Kumar
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Gupta, Deepak Kumar
    Verma, Jyoti Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 2870 - 2877
  • [44] Current state and research directions for disposable versus reusable packaging: A systematic literature review of comparative studies
    Palsson, Henrik
    Olsson, John
    PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2023, 36 (06) : 391 - 409
  • [45] Ligation Versus Bipolar Diathermy for Hemostasis in Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study
    Sharma, Karan
    Kumar, Devinder
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 63 (01): : 15 - 19
  • [46] Eco-efficiency of disposable and reusable surgical instruments-a scissors case
    Ibbotson, Suphunnika
    Dettmer, Tina
    Kara, Sami
    Herrmann, Christoph
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05): : 1137 - 1148
  • [48] Disposable versus Reusable Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Comparison
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Filippi, Beatrice
    Alriyalat, Sulieman
    Calori, Alberto
    Besana, Umberto
    Mueller, Alexander
    Pushkar, Dmitri
    Romero-Otero, Javier
    Pastore, Antonio
    Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
    Micali, Salvatore
    Buizza, Carlo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 63 - 71
  • [49] Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: A prospective evaluation of costs
    Kozarek, RA
    Raltz, SL
    Merriam, LD
    Sumida, SE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) : 10 - 13
  • [50] A Comparative Carbon Footprint Analysis of Disposable and Reusable Vaginal Specula
    Donahue, Laura M.
    Hilton, Stephen
    Bell, Sarah G.
    Williams, Brent C.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (06) : 352 - 354