Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections

被引:0
|
作者
Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Winsloe, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Southland Hosp, Eye Clin, Kew Rd, Invercargill 9812, New Zealand
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Fac Sci, Liverpool, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIM: The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. METHODS: The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. RESULTS: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 65
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reusable versus disposable instruments in tonsillectomy: A comparative study of outcomes
    Maheshwar, A
    De, M
    Browning, ST
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2003, 57 (07) : 579 - 583
  • [2] Reducing the Cost of Laparoscopy: Reusable versus Disposable Laparoscopic Instruments
    Manatakis, Dimitrios K.
    Georgopoulos, Nikolaos
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2014, 2014
  • [3] DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY INSTRUMENTS - AN AUDIT OF COSTS
    WILKINSON, JM
    HARGRAVE, M
    HOSIE, KB
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY, 1995, 4 (04): : 211 - 214
  • [4] DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    PAOLUCCI, V
    SCHAEFF, B
    GUTT, C
    MORAWE, G
    ENCKE, A
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1995, 120 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [5] Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety
    Siu, Joey
    Hill, Andrew G.
    MacCormick, Andrew D.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (1-2) : 28 - 33
  • [6] Cost comparison: disposable vs reusable instruments
    Fengler, TW
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (08): : 878 - 878
  • [7] WILL COSTS DECIDE - DISPOSABLE OR REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    LEFERING, R
    TROIDL, H
    URE, BM
    CHIRURG, 1994, 65 (04): : 317 - 325
  • [8] Cost comparison: disposable vs reusable instruments - Reply
    Demoulin, L
    Kesteloot, K
    Penninckx, F
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (08): : 879 - 879
  • [9] Carbon footprint and environmental impact and costs of reusable versus disposable flexible ureteroscopic instruments: a comparison
    Mcgrath, S.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    Bolton, D.
    Fojecki, G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 72 - 72
  • [10] Does Cost Influence the Choice of Disposable Versus Reusable Instruments? Mailed Survey of Obstetrician/Gynaecologists
    Yang, Helen
    Capstick, Valerie A.
    Bentz, Christine
    Ross, Sue
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2019, 41 (10) : 1416 - 1422