WILL COSTS DECIDE - DISPOSABLE OR REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

被引:0
|
作者
LEFERING, R [1 ]
TROIDL, H [1 ]
URE, BM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV COLOGNE,LEHRSTUHL CHIRURG 2,CHIRURG KLIN,W-5000 COLOGNE 41,GERMANY
来源
CHIRURG | 1994年 / 65卷 / 04期
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COST ANALYSIS; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires new and specially designed instruments. Both, disposable and reusable instruments are available and frequently used. The purpose of this analysis was to compare these instruments with regard to safety and costs. A complete and detailed calculation comprising all cost components was performed using data from 534 patients. Safety of the procedure was assessed by the documentation of all events during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Costs: A standard operation with reusable instruments costs DM 3395. One third of these costs are non-hospital costs. Every postoperative day in hospital adds DM 234.44, every minute of operation time adds DM 4.88. Using a complete set of disposable instruments causes an increase in total costs of DM 1117, which mainly results from the costs of the instruments themselves. Safety: Among 1000 operations all performed with reusable instruments, 82.3% were uneventful for the patient. The wound infection rate was 2.3%. Until today no injuries of the staff caused by these instruments were observed. These findings demonstrate that reusable instruments are safe and cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY INSTRUMENTS - AN AUDIT OF COSTS
    WILKINSON, JM
    HARGRAVE, M
    HOSIE, KB
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY, 1995, 4 (04): : 211 - 214
  • [2] A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Demoulin, L
    Kesteloot, K
    Penninckx, F
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (05): : 520 - 525
  • [3] REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS ARE MORE COST-EFFECTIVE THAN DISPOSABLE INSTRUMENTS FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    APELGREN, KN
    BLANK, ML
    SLOMSKI, CA
    HADJIS, NS
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (01): : 32 - 34
  • [4] Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety
    Siu, Joey
    Hill, Andrew G.
    MacCormick, Andrew D.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (1-2) : 28 - 33
  • [5] Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Adler, S
    Scherrer, M
    Rückauer, KD
    Daschner, FD
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (02): : 268 - 272
  • [6] Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    S. Adler
    M. Scherrer
    K. D. Rückauer
    F. D. Daschner
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 268 - 272
  • [7] A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs
    Eddie, G
    White, S
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (10): : 671 - 675
  • [8] DISPOSABLE OR REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    ENGERT, K
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1995, 120 (05): : 416 - 416
  • [9] Reducing the Cost of Laparoscopy: Reusable versus Disposable Laparoscopic Instruments
    Manatakis, Dimitrios K.
    Georgopoulos, Nikolaos
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2014, 2014
  • [10] DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY - A CONTROLLED-STUDY
    PAOLUCCI, V
    SCHAEFF, B
    GUTT, C
    MORAWE, G
    ENCKE, A
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1995, 120 (01): : 47 - 52