Value for money of reusable versus disposable ophthalmic instruments for intravitreal injections

被引:0
|
作者
Sadiq, Saghir Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Winsloe, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Southland Hosp, Eye Clin, Kew Rd, Invercargill 9812, New Zealand
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Fac Sci, Liverpool, England
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIM: The aim of this study was to follow the instruments' pathways and cost each segment to calculate whether reusable or disposable ophthalmic instruments offer better value for money for intravitreal injections. METHODS: The cycles and costs of reusable and single-use disposable instruments used for intravitreal injections were mapped out, including purchase costs, transport to and from the place of use, opening and disposal, sterilisation, replacement, salary costs of staff involved, etc. RESULTS: The cost of using reusable instruments for intravitreal injections (NZ$29.00) was lower than the cost of using disposable instruments ($30.51) by $1.51 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injections performed with reusable instruments offer better value for money than when performed with disposable instruments. This equates to a beneficial financial saving just for this one low-complexity case. Such savings can multiply significantly when considering the instruments used in a wider variety of ophthalmic procedures. There are of course trade-offs between safety, quality, cost and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 65
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative evaluation of disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps costs.
    Deprez, PH
    Van Hassel, M
    Hoang, P
    Piessevaux, H
    Fiasse, R
    Horsmans, Y
    Vandenbosch, D
    Geubel, A
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (04) : AB47 - AB47
  • [42] Ophthalmic Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance A Randomized, Controlled Study of Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections
    Kim, Stephen J.
    Toma, Hassanain S.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (07) : 1358 - 1363
  • [43] RECORDING CHARACTERISTICS OF DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE MONOPOLAR EMG NEEDLE ELECTRODES
    PAN, SH
    CHU, J
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (09) : 878 - 878
  • [44] RECORDING CHARACTERISTICS OF DISPOSABLE VERSUS REUSABLE CONCENTRIC EMG NEEDLE ELECTRODES
    TEDMAN, BM
    NANDEDKAR, SD
    SANDERS, DB
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 1989, 12 (09) : 753 - 753
  • [45] Disposable versus reusable medical devices and carbon footprint: old is gold
    Sanfilippo, Filippo
    Zeidan, Ahed
    Hasanin, Ahmed
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (05)
  • [46] Disposable versus reusable jet nebulizers for cystic fibrosis treatment with tobramycin
    Vecellio, Laurent
    Abdelrahim, Mohamed E.
    Montharu, Jerome
    Galle, Julien
    Diot, Patrice
    Dubus, Jean-Christophe
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2011, 10 (02) : 86 - 92
  • [47] Disposable versus reusable oximeter probes: A cost-benefit analysis
    Joshi, GP
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (2S):
  • [48] Single-use versus reuse of instruments in ophthalmic surgery
    Rajiv Raman
    Chetan Rao
    Paisan Ruamviboonsuk
    Suber Huang
    Tarun Sharma
    Eye, 2023, 37 : 2839 - 2840
  • [49] Single-use versus reuse of instruments in ophthalmic surgery
    Raman, Rajiv
    Rao, Chetan
    Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan
    Huang, Suber
    Sharma, Tarun
    EYE, 2023, 37 (14) : 2839 - 2840
  • [50] Pharmacokinetics of Pars Plana Intravitreal Injections versus Microcannula Suprachoroidal Injections of Bevacizumab in a Porcine Model
    Olsen, Timothy W.
    Feng, Xiao
    Wabner, Kathy
    Csaky, Karl
    Pambuccian, Stefan
    Cameron, J. Douglas
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (07) : 4749 - 4756