Simulated cup/disc ratio: a tool for ophthalmologists

被引:1
|
作者
Barbosa, Carolina Pelegrini [1 ]
Angelini, Pedro Felipe [2 ]
Schor, Paulo [1 ]
Paranhos, Augusto, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Escola Paulista Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Optic disc; Glaucoma/diagnosis; Optic nerve diseases/diagnosis; Diagnostic techniques; ophthalmological; Internet/utilization; Measures; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC-NERVE HEAD; VISUAL-FIELD; PREDICTIVE FACTORS; FIBER-LAYER; DISC; PROGRESSION; AGREEMENT; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1590/S0004-27492010000400003
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the observers' ability to measure simulations of cup/disc ratios (CDR) as concentric and non-concentric circles. Methods: In a prospective, random, and masked setting, 43 images representing the CDR spectrum from 0.2 to 0.9 for vertical and horizontal CDR measurements were developed and presented on a computer screen to 171 participants. Results: There were satisfactory agreements according to the kappa coefficient (0.755 and 0.730 for horizontal and vertical cup disc ratios, respectively) and Lin's concordance correlation (R=0.88 and R=0.86 for horizontal and vertical measurements, respectively). However, very poor agreement was found for intermediate CDR values. The worst agreement occurred when the CDR was between 0.4 and 0.6 for both the horizontal and vertical values. The kappa coefficient was 0.37 and 0.39 for 0.4 CDR (horizontal and vertical, respectively), 0.39 and 0.38 for 0.5 CDR (horizontal and vertical, respectively) and 0.45 and 0.41 for 0.6 CDR (horizontal and vertical, respectively). Conclusion: Despite a good general agreement between the gold standard and the participants' responses, the absolute agreement for intermediate CDR values was very poor for both horizontal and vertical values.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 322
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Structure and function comparison of cup/disc ratio and perimetric mean deviations
    Foote, Katharina G.
    Sha, Patricia
    Pahlevan-Chaleshtari, Tara
    Falkenstein, Iryna A.
    Severin, Todd
    Lee, Gary C.
    Callan, Thomas
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [43] Cup to disc ratio by optical coherence tomography is abnormal in multiple sclerosis
    Syc, Stephanie B.
    Warner, Christina V.
    Farrell, Sheena K.
    Balcer, Laura J.
    Frohman, Elliot M.
    Calabresi, Peter A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (08) : 1012 - 1012
  • [44] COMPARISON BETWEEN FUNDUSCOPICALLY AND AUTOMATED MEASUREMENT OF CUP-TO-DISC RATIO
    WOLFS, RCW
    RAMRATTAN, RS
    DEJONG, PTVM
    VISION RESEARCH, 1995, 35 : 4136 - 4136
  • [45] Benchmark Data Set For Glaucoma Detection With Annotated Cup To Disc Ratio
    Salam, Anum Abdul
    Akram, M. Usman
    Arouj, Amna
    Basit, Imran
    Shaqur, Tariq
    Javed, Haroon
    Sheeraz
    Wazir, Kamran
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS (ICSIGSYS), 2017, : 227 - 233
  • [46] Similarity regularized sparse group lasso for cup to disc ratio computation
    Cheng, Jun
    Zhang, Zhuo
    Tao, Dacheng
    Wong, Damon Wing Kee
    Liu, Jiang
    Baskaran, Mani
    Aung, Tin
    Wong, Tien Yin
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2017, 8 (08): : 3763 - 3777
  • [47] Cup-to-Disc Ratio in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension without Papilloedema
    Hamill, Eric
    Kim, James D.
    Yalamanchili, Sushma
    Paranilam, Jaya M.
    Al Zubidi, Nagham
    Lee, Andrew G.
    NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 38 (02) : 69 - 73
  • [48] Technical Note:: Grading the vertical cup:disc ratio and the effect of scaling
    Bennett, Ruth
    Spry, Paul G. D.
    Fenerty, Cecilia H.
    Harper, Robert A.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2007, 27 (06) : 619 - 625
  • [49] METHODOLOGIC DIFFERENCES AND MEASUREMENT OF CUP-DISC RATIO - EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT
    SCHWARTZ, JT
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1976, 94 (07) : 1101 - 1105
  • [50] Evaluation of patients with large cup:disc ratio of the optic nerve head
    Kesler, A
    Kotas-Neuman, R
    Kott, E
    Assia, E
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 32 (01) : 46 - 49