Decompression Alone Compared to Decompression With Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

被引:8
|
作者
Pranata, Raymond [1 ]
Lim, Michael Anthonius [1 ]
Vania, Rachel [1 ]
Mahadewa, Tjokorda Gde Bagus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pelita Harapan, Fac Med, Tangerang, Indonesia
[2] Udayana Univ, Div Neurosurg, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
来源
关键词
decompression; spinal fusion; spondylolisthesis; lumbar vertebra; SPINAL STENOSIS; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERBODY FUSION; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.14444/8179
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of decompression alone compared to decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. We also aimed to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy and complications. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Europe PMC, Cochrane Central Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The main outcome was improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcome was back pain and leg pain improvement, complications, reoperation rate, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. Results: There were 3993 patients from 13 studies. Decompression with fusion was associated with greater reduction in ODI (mean difference 4.04 [95% CI 0.95, 7.13], P = 0.01) compared to decompression alone. Greater reduction in back (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.27 [95% CI 0.00, 0.53], P = 0.05) and leg pain (SMD 0.13 [95% CI 0.06, 0.21], P < 0.001) was observed in the decompression with fusion group. Complications were similar in the 2 groups (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.34, 1.04], P = 0.07). The reoperation rate was similar in both groups (P = 0.54). Decompression alone resulted in shorter duration of surgery (mean difference -85.18 minutes [95% CI -122.79, -47.57], P < 0.001), less blood loss (mean difference -262.65 mL [95% CI -313.45, -211.85], P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (mean difference -2.64 days [95% CI -3.58, -1.70], P < 0.001). Empirical Bayes random-effects meta-regression showed that the rate of complication was influenced by age (coefficient 0.172, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Decompression with fusion had greater efficacy than decompression alone but was associated with more blood loss, lengthier surgery, and hospitalization. In terms of complications, decompression alone may be beneficial in younger patients. (PROSPERO CRD42020211904)
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decompression with or without Fusion for Lumbar Synovial Cysts-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Benato, Alberto
    Menna, Grazia
    Rapisarda, Alessandro
    Polli, Filippo Maria
    D'Ercole, Manuela
    Izzo, Alessandro
    D'Alessandris, Quintino Giorgio
    Montano, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [22] Effect of fusion following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Liang, Lin
    Jiang, Wei-Min
    Li, Xue-Feng
    Wang, Heng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 14615 - 14624
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of interspinous process device compared with alone decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Changjiu
    Xiao, Guiling
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (23)
  • [24] Decompression Alone in the Setting of Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Echt, Murray
    Ramos, Rafael De la Garza
    Geng, Eric
    Isleem, Ula
    Schwarz, Julia
    Girdler, Steven
    Platt, Andrew
    Bakare, Adewale A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (03) : 861 - 872
  • [25] Effect of interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion on lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dantas, Francois
    Rolemberg Dantas, Fernando Luiz
    Botelho, Ricardo Vieira
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (05): : 756 - 768
  • [26] rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Peng-Fei
    Chen, Tao-Yu
    Zhang, Zhi-Liang
    Li, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Peng-Cui
    Wei, Lei
    Lu, Zhi
    Wei, Xiao-Chun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 22 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [27] rhBMP in lumber fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han PengFei
    Chen TaoYu
    Zhang ZhiLiang
    Li XiaoDong
    Li PengCui
    Wei Lei
    L Zhi
    Wei XiaoChun
    中华创伤杂志英文版, 2019, 22 (01)
  • [28] Outcomes of posterior cervical fusion and decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Youssef, Jim A.
    Heiner, Anneliese D.
    Montgomery, Jana R.
    Tender, Gabriel C.
    Lorio, Morgan P.
    Morreale, Joseph M.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (10): : 1714 - 1729
  • [29] Decompression Versus Fusion for Grade I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis
    Koenig, Scott
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    Shasti, Mark
    Jazini, Ehsan
    Koh, Eugene Y.
    Banagan, Kelley E.
    Gelb, Daniel E.
    Ludwig, Steven C.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [30] Decompression with fusion in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis
    Xu, Zhengfeng
    Yang, Yang
    Zhou, Xiaoxiao
    Mao, Yuanqing
    Zhao, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10): : 10679 - +