Decompression Alone in the Setting of Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Echt, Murray [1 ]
Ramos, Rafael De la Garza [2 ]
Geng, Eric [3 ]
Isleem, Ula [3 ]
Schwarz, Julia [3 ]
Girdler, Steven [3 ]
Platt, Andrew [1 ]
Bakare, Adewale A. [1 ]
Fessler, Richard G. [1 ]
Cho, Samuel K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, 1725 W Harrison St,Suite 855, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Orthoped, New York, NY USA
关键词
degenerative lumbar scoliosis; decompression; laminectomy; radiculopathy; MINIMALLY INVASIVE DECOMPRESSION; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; SPINAL DEFORMITY; BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION; PREDICTIVE FACTORS; APPROPRIATE USE; LIMITED FUSION; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/21925682221127955
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVESSurgical decompression alone for patients with neurogenic leg pain in the setting of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and stenosis is commonly performed, however, there is no summary of evidence for outcomes. Methods: A systematic search of English language medical literature databases was performed for studies describing outcomes of decompression alone in DLS, defined as Cobb angle >10 degrees, and 2-year minimum follow-up. Three outcomes were examined: 1) Cobb angle progression, 2) reoperation rate, and 3) ODI and overall satisfaction. Data were pooled and weighted averages were calculated to summarize available evidence. Results: Across 15 studies included in the final analysis, 586 patients were examined. Average preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 17.6 degrees (Range: 12.7 - 25) and 18.0 (range 14.1 - 25 degrees), respectively. Average change in Cobb angle was an increase of 1.8 degrees. Overall rate of reoperation ranged from 3 to 33% with an average of 9.7%. Average ODI before surgery, after surgery, and change in scores were 56.4%, 27.2%, and an improvement of 29% respectively. Average from 8 studies that reported patient satisfaction was 71.2%. Conclusions: Current literature on decompression alone in the setting of DLS is sparse and is not high quality, limited to patients with small magnitude of lumbar coronal Cobb angle, and heterogenous in the type of procedure performed. Based on available evidence, select patients with DLS who undergo decompression alone had minimal progression of Cobb angle, relatively low reoperation rate, and favorable patient-reported outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 872
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar
    Basilious, Mark
    Goldberg, Jacob L. L.
    Sommer, Fabian
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Mykolajtchuk, Catherine
    Ng, Amanda Z. Z.
    Medary, Branden
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Haertl, Roger
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (03) : 1054 - 1067
  • [2] Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pravesh Shankar Gadjradj
    Mark Basilious
    Jacob L. Goldberg
    Fabian Sommer
    Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez
    Catherine Mykolajtchuk
    Amanda Z. Ng
    Branden Medary
    Ibrahim Hussain
    Roger Härtl
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 1054 - 1067
  • [3] Decompression without Fusion for Radiculopathy in the Setting of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: A Meta-Analysis
    Echt, Murray
    Schwarz, Julia
    Hamad, Mousa
    Ramos, Rafael De la Garza
    Holland, Ryan
    Fortunel, Adisson N.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Yanamadala, Vijay
    Yassari, Reza
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 67 : 238 - 238
  • [4] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Hai-Feng
    Liu, Shu-Hao
    Chen, Zi-Xian
    Fei, Qin-Ming
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (12) : 3084 - 3095
  • [5] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hai-Feng Liang
    Shu-Hao Liu
    Zi-Xian Chen
    Qin-Ming Fei
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 3084 - 3095
  • [6] Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Zhubin
    Guan, Xiaojing
    Wang, Rui
    Xue, Qian
    Zhang, Ding
    Zong, Yuan
    Ma, Wenxuan
    Zhuge, Ruijian
    Liu, Zhiming
    He, Changhao
    Guo, Li
    Yin, Fei
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [7] Decompression versus decompression plus fusion for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Peng
    Liu, Zhenxiu
    Liu, Hong
    Yu, Yaqiong
    Huang, Liqun
    Lu, Min
    Jin, Xiaohong
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (04) : 390 - 398
  • [8] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Wenli
    Yuwen, Peizhi
    Zhu, Yanbing
    Wei, Ning
    Feng, Chen
    Zhang, Yingze
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (05) : 637 - 650
  • [9] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wenli Chang
    Peizhi Yuwen
    Yanbing Zhu
    Ning Wei
    Chen Feng
    Yingze Zhang
    Wei Chen
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137 : 637 - 650
  • [10] Comparison between Decompression Alone and with Additional Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Arimbawa, Ida Bagus Gede
    Pranata, Cokorda Gde Rama Adi
    Daniati, Sonia
    Putra, Made Winatra Satya
    Savio, Sherly Desnita
    Wiguna, I. Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha
    Ridia, Ketut Gede Mulyadi
    Suyasa, I. Ketut
    [J]. SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 7 (01): : 42 - 51