Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Shen, Zhubin [1 ]
Guan, Xiaojing [1 ]
Wang, Rui [2 ]
Xue, Qian [2 ]
Zhang, Ding [1 ]
Zong, Yuan [1 ]
Ma, Wenxuan [2 ]
Zhuge, Ruijian [2 ]
Liu, Zhiming [1 ]
He, Changhao [2 ]
Guo, Li [2 ]
Yin, Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, China Japan Union Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, 126 Xiantai Ave, Changchun 130033, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Toxicol, Changchun, Peoples R China
关键词
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS); degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS); decompression; fusion; meta-analysis; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; LAMINECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.21037/atm-22-2208
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: There have been lingering controversies reported decompression and plus fusion. And the relative safety of fusion in addition to standard decompression remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone or combined with fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant literature from their inception to 28th December 2021. We identified the eligible studies based on the PICOS principles, populations (LSS with DS), interventions (decompression alone), controls (decompression combined with fusion), outcomes [overall reoperation rate, complications, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), operative time, the amount of blood lost, length of stay (LOS), and visual analog scales (VAS)], study design (cohort studies). Quality assessment for individual study was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: In all, 12 articles involving a total of 14,693 patients were finally included in the study, the majority of patients underwent decompression alone (DA group: n=11,598) and the rest underwent decompression associated with fusion (FU group: n=3,095). The quality of most of the included studies was regarded as high quality. The results indicated that the FU group had a higher rate of complication [relative risk (RR): 1.770, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.485 to 2.110], longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 51.037, 95% Cl: 13.743 to 88.334 and increased blood loss (WMD: 258.354, 95% CI: 150.468 to 366.239) than the DA group (all P<0.05), with no significant differences for overall reoperation rate (RR: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.432 to 1.786), ODI (WMD: -2.569, 95% CI: -6.548 to 1.409), LOS (WMD: 3.838, 95% CI: -2.172 to 9.848), and VAS found between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: In patients with LSS + DS, the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone may be superior to decompression plus fusion in terms of complication rate, operative time, and the amount of bleeding. However, more high-quality literature is needed in the future to confirm the best treatment choice for patients with LSS + DS.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pravesh Shankar Gadjradj
    Mark Basilious
    Jacob L. Goldberg
    Fabian Sommer
    Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez
    Catherine Mykolajtchuk
    Amanda Z. Ng
    Branden Medary
    Ibrahim Hussain
    Roger Härtl
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 1054 - 1067
  • [2] Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar
    Basilious, Mark
    Goldberg, Jacob L. L.
    Sommer, Fabian
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Mykolajtchuk, Catherine
    Ng, Amanda Z. Z.
    Medary, Branden
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Haertl, Roger
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (03) : 1054 - 1067
  • [3] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Hai-Feng
    Liu, Shu-Hao
    Chen, Zi-Xian
    Fei, Qin-Ming
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (12) : 3084 - 3095
  • [4] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hai-Feng Liang
    Shu-Hao Liu
    Zi-Xian Chen
    Qin-Ming Fei
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 3084 - 3095
  • [5] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Wenli
    Yuwen, Peizhi
    Zhu, Yanbing
    Wei, Ning
    Feng, Chen
    Zhang, Yingze
    Chen, Wei
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (05) : 637 - 650
  • [6] Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wenli Chang
    Peizhi Yuwen
    Yanbing Zhu
    Ning Wei
    Chen Feng
    Yingze Zhang
    Wei Chen
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137 : 637 - 650
  • [7] Decompression versus decompression plus fusion for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Peng
    Liu, Zhenxiu
    Liu, Hong
    Yu, Yaqiong
    Huang, Liqun
    Lu, Min
    Jin, Xiaohong
    [J]. PAIN PRACTICE, 2023, 23 (04) : 390 - 398
  • [8] Decompression Alone Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zihao
    Xie, Peigen
    Feng, Feng
    Chhantyal, Kishor
    Yang, Yang
    Rong, Limin
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E158 - E170
  • [9] Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumented fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
    Kaiser, Radek
    Kantorova, Lucia
    Langaufova, Alena
    Slezakova, Simona
    Tuckova, Dagmar
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Klezl, Zdenek
    Barsa, Pavel
    Cienciala, Jan
    Hajduk, Richard
    Hrabalek, Lumir
    Kucera, Roman
    Netuka, David
    Prymek, Martin
    Repko, Martin
    Smrcka, Martin
    Stulik, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 94 (08): : 657 - 666
  • [10] Decompression with fusion versus decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Bo
    Lv, Yao
    Wang, Zhi-Cui
    Guo, Xiu-Cheng
    Chao, Chu-Zhang
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (38) : E21973