Decompression Alone Compared to Decompression With Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

被引:8
|
作者
Pranata, Raymond [1 ]
Lim, Michael Anthonius [1 ]
Vania, Rachel [1 ]
Mahadewa, Tjokorda Gde Bagus [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pelita Harapan, Fac Med, Tangerang, Indonesia
[2] Udayana Univ, Div Neurosurg, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
来源
关键词
decompression; spinal fusion; spondylolisthesis; lumbar vertebra; SPINAL STENOSIS; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERBODY FUSION; PLUS FUSION; SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.14444/8179
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of decompression alone compared to decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. We also aimed to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy and complications. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Europe PMC, Cochrane Central Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The main outcome was improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcome was back pain and leg pain improvement, complications, reoperation rate, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. Results: There were 3993 patients from 13 studies. Decompression with fusion was associated with greater reduction in ODI (mean difference 4.04 [95% CI 0.95, 7.13], P = 0.01) compared to decompression alone. Greater reduction in back (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.27 [95% CI 0.00, 0.53], P = 0.05) and leg pain (SMD 0.13 [95% CI 0.06, 0.21], P < 0.001) was observed in the decompression with fusion group. Complications were similar in the 2 groups (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.34, 1.04], P = 0.07). The reoperation rate was similar in both groups (P = 0.54). Decompression alone resulted in shorter duration of surgery (mean difference -85.18 minutes [95% CI -122.79, -47.57], P < 0.001), less blood loss (mean difference -262.65 mL [95% CI -313.45, -211.85], P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (mean difference -2.64 days [95% CI -3.58, -1.70], P < 0.001). Empirical Bayes random-effects meta-regression showed that the rate of complication was influenced by age (coefficient 0.172, P = 0.004). Conclusion: Decompression with fusion had greater efficacy than decompression alone but was associated with more blood loss, lengthier surgery, and hospitalization. In terms of complications, decompression alone may be beneficial in younger patients. (PROSPERO CRD42020211904)
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decompression alone versus fusion and Coflex in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease A network meta-analysis
    Fan, Yunpeng
    Zhu, Liulong
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (11) : E19457
  • [32] Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
    Xu, Shuai
    Wang, Jinyu
    Liang, Yan
    Zhu, Zhenqi
    Wang, Kaifeng
    Qian, Yalong
    Liu, Haiying
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (46) : e17849
  • [33] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression
    Scholler, Karsten
    Alimi, Marjan
    Cong, Guang-Ting
    Christos, Paul
    Hartl, Roger
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (03) : 355 - 367
  • [34] Is Indirect Decompression and Fusion More Effective than Direct Decompression and Fusion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability? A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis
    Gagliardi, Martin J.
    Guiroy, Alfredo J.
    Camino-Willhuber, Gaston
    Joaquim, Andrei F.
    Carazzo, Charles A.
    Yasuda, Ezequiel
    Cabrera, Juan P.
    Ciancio, Alejandro R. Morales
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (02) : 499 - 511
  • [35] Decompression Alone Versus Interspinous/Interlaminar Device Placement for Degenerative Lumbar Pathologies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pennington, Zach
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Mikula, Anthony L.
    Elsamadicy, Aladine A.
    Potes, Maria Astudillo
    Fogelson, Jeremy L.
    Grossbach, Andrew J.
    Elder, Benjamin D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 185
  • [36] Left atrium decompression devices efficacy in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis
    Basile, Christian
    Paolillo, S.
    Gargiulo, P.
    Marzano, F.
    Rodolico, D.
    Dellegrottaglie, S.
    Abbate, V.
    Ambrosio, A.
    Carbone, F.
    Dell'aversana, S.
    Esposito, I.
    Fierro, M. F.
    Perrone-Filardi, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 392 - 393
  • [37] Biportal endoscopic decompression vs. microscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Tiewu
    Zhou, Guoqing
    Chen, Zhineng
    Yao, Xinmiao
    Liu, Dan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 20 (03) : 2743 - 2751
  • [38] Laminectomy With Fusion is Associated With Greater Functional Improvement Compared With Laminectomy Alone for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shukla, Geet G.
    Chilakapati, Sai S.
    Matur, Abhijith V.
    Palmisciano, Paolo
    Conteh, Fatu
    Onyewadume, Louisa
    Duah, Henry
    Griffith, Azante
    Tao, Xu
    Vorster, Phillip
    Gupta, Sahil
    Cheng, Joseph
    Motley, Benjamin
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (12) : 874 - 884
  • [39] Comparison of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoshii, Toshitaka
    Egawa, Satroru
    Chikuda, Hirotaka
    Wakao, Norimitsu
    Furuya, Takeo
    Kanchiku, Tsukasa
    Nagoshi, Narihito
    Fujiwara, Yasushi
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Taguchi, Toshihiko
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2020, 25 (06) : 938 - 945
  • [40] Is There a Role for Decompression Alone for Treating Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Systematic Review
    Joaquim, Andrei F.
    Milano, Jeronimo B.
    Ghizoni, Enrico
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (05): : 191 - 202