Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model

被引:65
|
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Williams, Christina [1 ]
Jin, Judy [1 ]
McGee, Michael F. [1 ]
Schomisch, Steve [1 ]
Marks, Jeffrey [1 ]
Ponsky, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2007年 / 194卷 / 03期
关键词
component separation; laparoscopic; minimally invasive; ventral hernia;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The ideal surgical, treatment for complicated ventral hernias remains elusive. Traditional component separation provides local advancement of native tissue for tension-free closure without prosthetic materials. This technique requires an extensive subcutaneous dissection with division of perforating vessels predisposing to skin-flap necrosis and complicated wound infections. A minimally invasive component separation may decrease wound complication rates; however, the adequacy of the myofascial advancement has not been studied. Methods: Five 25-kg pigs underwent bilateral laparoscopic component separation. A 10-mm incision was made lateral to the rectus abdorninus muscle. The external oblique fascia was incised, and a dissecting balloon was inflated between the internal and external oblique muscles. Two additional ports were placed in the intermuscular space. The external oblique was incised from the costal margin to the inguinal ligament. The maximal abdominal wall advancement was recorded. A formal open-component separation was performed and maximal advancement 5 cm superior and 5 cm inferior to the umbilicus was recorded for comparison. Groups were compared using standard statistical analysis. Results: The laparoscopic component separation was completed successfully in all animals, with a mean of 22 min/side. Laparoscopic component separation yielded 3.9 cm (SD 1. 1) of fascia] advancement above the umbilicus, whereas 4.4 cm (1.2) was obtained after open release (P =.24). Below the umbilicus, laparoscopic release achieved 5.0 cm (1.0) of advancement, whereas 5.8 cm (1.2) was gained after open release (P =.13). Comments: The minimally invasive component separation achieved an average of 86% of the myofascial advancement compared with a formal open release. The laparoscopic approach does not require extensive subcutaneous dissection and might theoretically result in a decreased incidence or decreased complexity of postoperative wound infections or skin-flap necrosis. Based on our preliminary data in this porcine model, further comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open component separation in complex ventral hernia repair is warranted to evaluate postoperative morbidity and long-term hernia recurrence rates. 0 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 389
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients
    Gill, IS
    Matin, SF
    Desai, MM
    Kaouk, JH
    Steinberg, A
    Mascha, E
    Thornton, J
    Sherief, MH
    Strzempkowski, B
    Novick, AC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (01): : 64 - 68
  • [42] Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes at a Single Institution
    Jarufe, Nicolas
    Soto, Pedro
    Ahumada, Vanessa
    Pacheco, Sergio
    Salinas, Jose
    Galindo, Jose
    Bachler, Jean-Phillipe
    Achurra, Pablo
    Rebolledo, Rolando
    Guerra, Juan F.
    Briceno, Eduardo
    Martinez, Jorge
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (01): : 62 - 66
  • [43] Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Changes in the Abdominal Wall Musculature Morphology after Open Posterior Component Separation or Bridging Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
    De Silva, Gayan S.
    Krpata, David M.
    Hicks, Caitlin W.
    Criss, Cory N.
    Gao, Yue
    Rosen, Michael J.
    Novitsky, Yuri W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (03) : 353 - 357
  • [44] An outcomes analysis of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy
    Tang, P. C.
    Roman, S. A.
    Sosa, J. A.
    Cheung, K.
    Udelsman, R.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 : 47 - 47
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy: Outcomes Analysis
    Yaghoubian, Arezou
    Kaji, Amy H.
    Lee, Steven L.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2012, 78 (10) : 1083 - 1086
  • [46] Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis - A comparative study
    Kapischke, M
    Bley, K
    Tepell, J
    Schulz, T
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2005, 130 (02): : 137 - 140
  • [48] Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Versus Open Nephrectomy in Children: A Comparative Study
    Morsi, H. A.
    Abu ElFetouh, H., I
    Daw, M. A.
    ANNALS OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2006, 2 (01): : 24 - 27
  • [49] A comparative study of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant lesions
    Khaled, Yazan S.
    Barrie, Jenifer
    Carino, Nicola De Liguori
    Deshpande, Rahul
    O'Reilly, Derek A.
    Sherlock, David
    Ammori, Basil J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 : 8 - 8
  • [50] Laparoscopic Versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly:: A comparative study
    Owera, Anas
    Hamade, Ayman M.
    Hani, Omaya I. Bani
    Ammori, Basil J.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (03): : 241 - 246