Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model

被引:65
|
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Williams, Christina [1 ]
Jin, Judy [1 ]
McGee, Michael F. [1 ]
Schomisch, Steve [1 ]
Marks, Jeffrey [1 ]
Ponsky, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2007年 / 194卷 / 03期
关键词
component separation; laparoscopic; minimally invasive; ventral hernia;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The ideal surgical, treatment for complicated ventral hernias remains elusive. Traditional component separation provides local advancement of native tissue for tension-free closure without prosthetic materials. This technique requires an extensive subcutaneous dissection with division of perforating vessels predisposing to skin-flap necrosis and complicated wound infections. A minimally invasive component separation may decrease wound complication rates; however, the adequacy of the myofascial advancement has not been studied. Methods: Five 25-kg pigs underwent bilateral laparoscopic component separation. A 10-mm incision was made lateral to the rectus abdorninus muscle. The external oblique fascia was incised, and a dissecting balloon was inflated between the internal and external oblique muscles. Two additional ports were placed in the intermuscular space. The external oblique was incised from the costal margin to the inguinal ligament. The maximal abdominal wall advancement was recorded. A formal open-component separation was performed and maximal advancement 5 cm superior and 5 cm inferior to the umbilicus was recorded for comparison. Groups were compared using standard statistical analysis. Results: The laparoscopic component separation was completed successfully in all animals, with a mean of 22 min/side. Laparoscopic component separation yielded 3.9 cm (SD 1. 1) of fascia] advancement above the umbilicus, whereas 4.4 cm (1.2) was obtained after open release (P =.24). Below the umbilicus, laparoscopic release achieved 5.0 cm (1.0) of advancement, whereas 5.8 cm (1.2) was gained after open release (P =.13). Comments: The minimally invasive component separation achieved an average of 86% of the myofascial advancement compared with a formal open release. The laparoscopic approach does not require extensive subcutaneous dissection and might theoretically result in a decreased incidence or decreased complexity of postoperative wound infections or skin-flap necrosis. Based on our preliminary data in this porcine model, further comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open component separation in complex ventral hernia repair is warranted to evaluate postoperative morbidity and long-term hernia recurrence rates. 0 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 389
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative evaluation of gastrointestinal transit and immune response between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in a porcine model
    Ueda, K
    Matteotti, R
    Assalia, A
    Gagner, M
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [22] Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison
    Karem C. Harth
    Johnie Rose
    Conor P. Delaney
    Jeffrey A. Blatnik
    Ihab Halaweish
    Michael J. Rosen
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 2865 - 2870
  • [23] Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison
    Harth, Karem C.
    Rose, Johnie
    Delaney, Conor P.
    Blatnik, Jeffrey A.
    Halaweish, Ihab
    Rosen, Michael J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (09): : 2865 - 2870
  • [24] Comparison of Outcome After Mesh-Only Repair, Laparoscopic Component Separation, and Open Component Separation
    Tong, Winnie M. Y.
    Hope, William
    Overby, David W.
    Hultman, Charles S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 66 (05) : 551 - 556
  • [25] Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy
    Zeng, Haitao
    Xiong, Xiaoli
    Huang, Song
    Zhang, Jia
    Liu, Hongliang
    Huang, Yong
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2024, 34 (06): : 614 - 618
  • [26] Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Procedures in Specific General Surgical Interventions
    Patil Jr, Mihir
    Gharde, Pankaj
    Reddy, Kavyanjali
    Nayak, Krushank
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [27] Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection
    Zigang Ding
    Yong Huang
    Lingpeng Liu
    Bangran Xu
    Hu Xiong
    Dilai Luo
    Mingwen Huang
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, 405 : 737 - 744
  • [28] Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection
    Ding, Zigang
    Huang, Yong
    Liu, Lingpeng
    Xu, Bangran
    Xiong, Hu
    Luo, Dilai
    Huang, Mingwen
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (06) : 737 - 744
  • [29] Comparative analysis of the Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters during laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy:: An experimental model
    Saenz, J.
    Asuero, M. S.
    Correa, C.
    Garcia, J.
    Villafruela, J. J.
    Cuevas, B.
    Paez, A.
    Linares, A.
    Galindo, J.
    Pascual, J.
    Marcen, R.
    Burgos, F. J.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (07) : 2105 - 2108
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: A comparative study
    Baumert, H
    Ballaro, A
    Dugardin, F
    Kaisary, AV
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05): : 1691 - 1694