Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model

被引:65
|
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Williams, Christina [1 ]
Jin, Judy [1 ]
McGee, Michael F. [1 ]
Schomisch, Steve [1 ]
Marks, Jeffrey [1 ]
Ponsky, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2007年 / 194卷 / 03期
关键词
component separation; laparoscopic; minimally invasive; ventral hernia;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The ideal surgical, treatment for complicated ventral hernias remains elusive. Traditional component separation provides local advancement of native tissue for tension-free closure without prosthetic materials. This technique requires an extensive subcutaneous dissection with division of perforating vessels predisposing to skin-flap necrosis and complicated wound infections. A minimally invasive component separation may decrease wound complication rates; however, the adequacy of the myofascial advancement has not been studied. Methods: Five 25-kg pigs underwent bilateral laparoscopic component separation. A 10-mm incision was made lateral to the rectus abdorninus muscle. The external oblique fascia was incised, and a dissecting balloon was inflated between the internal and external oblique muscles. Two additional ports were placed in the intermuscular space. The external oblique was incised from the costal margin to the inguinal ligament. The maximal abdominal wall advancement was recorded. A formal open-component separation was performed and maximal advancement 5 cm superior and 5 cm inferior to the umbilicus was recorded for comparison. Groups were compared using standard statistical analysis. Results: The laparoscopic component separation was completed successfully in all animals, with a mean of 22 min/side. Laparoscopic component separation yielded 3.9 cm (SD 1. 1) of fascia] advancement above the umbilicus, whereas 4.4 cm (1.2) was obtained after open release (P =.24). Below the umbilicus, laparoscopic release achieved 5.0 cm (1.0) of advancement, whereas 5.8 cm (1.2) was gained after open release (P =.13). Comments: The minimally invasive component separation achieved an average of 86% of the myofascial advancement compared with a formal open release. The laparoscopic approach does not require extensive subcutaneous dissection and might theoretically result in a decreased incidence or decreased complexity of postoperative wound infections or skin-flap necrosis. Based on our preliminary data in this porcine model, further comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open component separation in complex ventral hernia repair is warranted to evaluate postoperative morbidity and long-term hernia recurrence rates. 0 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 389
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Open Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
    Ahmed, Sagheer
    Iqbal, Tariq
    Abdullah, Muhammad Shuaib
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (02): : 383 - 386
  • [32] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Alsaigh, Sultan
    Alshebromi, Mawiah
    Alammar, Alhanouf
    Altwejri, Abdulaziz
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (01): : 1925 - 1931
  • [33] Laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy: a comparative study
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    Di Giuro, Giuseppe
    Dubrez, Julien
    Lainas, Panagiotis
    Smadja, Claude
    Franco, Dominique
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (02): : 173 - 177
  • [34] A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY - OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
    Sankarlingam
    Karthik
    Aswini
    Vaithiswaran, Arikrishnan
    Palanisamy
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (93): : 6886 - 6890
  • [35] Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus open adenomectomy: A comparative study
    Angel Bergero, Miguel
    Manuel Alvarez, Juan
    Cruz Liyo, Juan
    Dourado, Leandro
    Menendez, Nicolas
    Carlos, David
    Dipatto, Fernando
    Tirapegui, Sebastian
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (04): : 268 - 273
  • [36] Laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy: A comparative study
    Delaitre, B
    Pitre, J
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 44 (13) : 45 - 49
  • [37] Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy
    Okhrimenko, H. I.
    Holovko, M. H.
    Hrushka, V. A.
    Haidarzhi, Ye. I.
    Podluzhnyi, O. O.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, (05) : 664 - 667
  • [38] Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in children
    Sekaran, P.
    MacKinlay, G. A.
    Lam, J.
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 51 (04) : 15 - 17
  • [39] Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy versus Open Appendicectomy
    Reddy, B. Karunakar
    Srinivas, T.
    Sindhu, A. Nyna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (09) : 8 - 11