Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model

被引:65
|
作者
Rosen, Michael J. [1 ]
Williams, Christina [1 ]
Jin, Judy [1 ]
McGee, Michael F. [1 ]
Schomisch, Steve [1 ]
Marks, Jeffrey [1 ]
Ponsky, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2007年 / 194卷 / 03期
关键词
component separation; laparoscopic; minimally invasive; ventral hernia;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The ideal surgical, treatment for complicated ventral hernias remains elusive. Traditional component separation provides local advancement of native tissue for tension-free closure without prosthetic materials. This technique requires an extensive subcutaneous dissection with division of perforating vessels predisposing to skin-flap necrosis and complicated wound infections. A minimally invasive component separation may decrease wound complication rates; however, the adequacy of the myofascial advancement has not been studied. Methods: Five 25-kg pigs underwent bilateral laparoscopic component separation. A 10-mm incision was made lateral to the rectus abdorninus muscle. The external oblique fascia was incised, and a dissecting balloon was inflated between the internal and external oblique muscles. Two additional ports were placed in the intermuscular space. The external oblique was incised from the costal margin to the inguinal ligament. The maximal abdominal wall advancement was recorded. A formal open-component separation was performed and maximal advancement 5 cm superior and 5 cm inferior to the umbilicus was recorded for comparison. Groups were compared using standard statistical analysis. Results: The laparoscopic component separation was completed successfully in all animals, with a mean of 22 min/side. Laparoscopic component separation yielded 3.9 cm (SD 1. 1) of fascia] advancement above the umbilicus, whereas 4.4 cm (1.2) was obtained after open release (P =.24). Below the umbilicus, laparoscopic release achieved 5.0 cm (1.0) of advancement, whereas 5.8 cm (1.2) was gained after open release (P =.13). Comments: The minimally invasive component separation achieved an average of 86% of the myofascial advancement compared with a formal open release. The laparoscopic approach does not require extensive subcutaneous dissection and might theoretically result in a decreased incidence or decreased complexity of postoperative wound infections or skin-flap necrosis. Based on our preliminary data in this porcine model, further comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open component separation in complex ventral hernia repair is warranted to evaluate postoperative morbidity and long-term hernia recurrence rates. 0 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 389
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy
    Brunt, LM
    Langer, JC
    Quasebarth, MA
    Whitman, ED
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (05): : 596 - 601
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis
    Rosen, Michael J.
    Cobb, William. S.
    Kercher, Kent W.
    Heniford, B. Todd
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (06) : 895 - 900
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: A comparative analysis
    Michael J. Rosen
    William S. Cobb
    Kent W. Kercher
    B. Todd Heniford
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2006, 10 : 895 - 900
  • [4] Open versus laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the porcine model
    Badwan, Khalid
    Vardi, Itay
    Chavla, Naeem
    Bhayani, Sam
    Maxwell, Keegan
    Arett, Christopher
    Soliman, Mohamad
    Baca, Geneva
    Humphrey, Peter
    Figenshau, Robert
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A199 - A199
  • [5] Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Fascial Component Separation for Complex Ventral Hernia Repair
    Ng, Nathaniel
    Wampler, Mallory
    Palladino, Humberto
    Agullo, Francisco
    Davis, Brian R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2015, 81 (07) : 714 - 719
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis
    Michel, M.
    Turnbull, M.
    Stevens, L.
    Saha, A.
    Sarela, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 81 - 81
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. A prospective comparative analysis
    Chouillard, E.
    Gumbs, A. A.
    Meyer, F.
    Torcivia, A.
    Helmy, N.
    Toubal, M.
    Karaa, A.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2010, 65 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: A comparative study
    Franciosi, C
    Caprotti, R
    Romano, F
    Porta, G
    Real, G
    Colombo, G
    Uggeri, F
    E.A.E.S: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2000, : 297 - 303
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open ureterolithotomy - A comparative study
    Skrepetis, K
    Doumas, K
    Siafakas, I
    Lykourinas, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 32 - 36
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: A comparative study
    Franciosi, C
    Caprotti, R
    Romano, F
    Porta, G
    Real, G
    Colombo, G
    Uggeri, F
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2000, 10 (05): : 291 - 295