Timeline blurring in fluent Chinese-English bilinguals

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Yang [1 ]
Jones, Manon [1 ]
Thierry, Guillaume [1 ]
机构
[1] Bangor Univ, Sch Psychol, Bangor LL57 2AS, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
Reference time; Tenselessness; Event-related potentials; Syntax-semantics interference; Linguistic relativity; Sentence processing; BRAIN POTENTIALS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; LANGUAGE; ERP; RECOGNITION; REPRESENTATION; MONOLINGUALS; PERCEPTION; COGNITION; MANDARIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2018.07.008
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Linguistic relativity effects arising from differences in terminology and syntax between languages have now been established in various domains of human cognition. Although metaphors have been shown to affect time conceptualisation, there is little evidence to date that the presence or absence of tense within a given language can affect how one processes temporal sequences of events. Here, we set out to characterise how native speakers of Mandarin Chinese - a tenseless language-deal with reference time misalignment using event-related brain potentials. Fluent Chinese-English participants and native speakers of English made acceptability judgements on sentences in which the adjunct clause started with the connective 'after' and was either temporally aligned or not with the main clause in terms of reference time conveyed by the verb. Native speakers of English failed to overtly report such reference time misalignments between clauses, but significant N400 modulations showed that they nevertheless required additional semantic processing effort. Chinese speakers, however, showed no such N400 modulation suggesting that they did not covertly detect reference time misalignments between clauses in real time. Critically, all participants manifested normal sentence comprehension as shown by a standard N400 semantic violation elicited by incongruent endings. We conclude that Chinese speakers of English experience difficulties locating events on a timeline in relation to one another when temporal information is conveyed by tense. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 102
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and use of English evaluative expressions in narratives of Chinese-English bilinguals
    Chen, Liang
    Yan, Ruixia
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2011, 14 (04) : 570 - 578
  • [22] Effects of Chinese word structure on object categorization in Chinese-English bilinguals
    Pan, Xuan
    Jared, Debra
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2020, 12 (03) : 468 - 500
  • [23] The embodiment of power as upward/downward movement in Chinese-English bilinguals
    Yang, Huilan
    Reid, Jeffrey Nick
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2024,
  • [24] SEMANTIC FACILITATION AND TRANSLATION PRIMING EFFECTS IN CHINESE-ENGLISH BILINGUALS
    CHEN, HC
    NG, ML
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1989, 17 (04) : 454 - 462
  • [25] Chinese-English bilinguals processing temporal-spatial metaphor
    Xue, Jin
    Yang, Jie
    Zhao, Qian
    [J]. COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2014, 15 (03) : 269 - 281
  • [26] The Proximate Phonological Unit of Chinese-English Bilinguals: Proficiency Matters
    Verdonschot, Rinus Gerardus
    Nakayama, Mariko
    Zhang, Qingfang
    Tamaoka, Katsuo
    Schiller, Niels Olaf
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [27] Fast Automatic Translation and Morphological Decomposition in Chinese-English Bilinguals
    Zhang, Taoli
    van Heuven, Walter J. B.
    Conklin, Kathy
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (10) : 1237 - 1242
  • [28] Aspectual interpretation and mass/count knowledge in Chinese-English bilinguals
    Yin, Bin
    O'Brien, Beth Ann
    [J]. LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2019, 9 (03) : 468 - 503
  • [29] Structural priming during sentence comprehension in Chinese-English bilinguals
    Hsieh, Yufen
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2017, 38 (03) : 657 - 678
  • [30] The neural substrates underlying translation processing in Chinese-English bilinguals
    Ding, GS
    Peng, DL
    Perry, C
    Ma, L
    Xu, SY
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 342 - 342