Analysis of temperature field and effect of cold-formed stainless steel roof panels

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Dayang [1 ,3 ]
Xin, Zhiyong [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Mingming [1 ]
Ou, Tong [3 ,4 ]
Mao, Jihua [5 ]
Zhu, Yong [1 ]
Tan, Jian [4 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Zhuhai Envete Engn Testing Co LTD, Guangzhou 519000, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Engn Res Ctr Met Cladding & Roofing Syst, Zhaoqing 510006, Peoples R China
[4] Architectural Design & Res Inst Guangdong Prov, Guangzhou 510000, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou guangjian construction Engn testing Ctr, Guangzhou 510600, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Experiments and numerical study; Temperature field; Thermal effects; Solar radiation; Roof panels; THERMAL-BEHAVIOR; BATTENS SUBJECT; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107575
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The thermal effects on large-span metal roof systems are significant due to solar radiation. In this paper, the temperature field and variations of monomer stainless steel (MSS) roof panels and continuous welded stainless steel (CWSS) roof panels are investigated. The MSS roof panels are considered different surface roughness, horizontal inclination angle and spatial location, and the CWSS roof panels are studied the influence of hori-zontal inclination angle and spatial location. Based on the test result, the temperature field and variations of the roof panels in a typical day, different light intensities, and wind speeds are analyzed in detail. Numerical simulation is further used to compare with the experimental results. The overall and local stress and deformation characteristics of the CWSS roof are analyzed, and relevant design improvement is proposed. The feasibility of a simplified temperature calculation approach for CWSS roof panels is verified by experimental and numerical results. The experimental and numerical study demonstrates that the temperature field and thermal effects on roof panels are significant. The maximum temperature of the roof panels reached 56.8 degrees C, and the maximum temperature difference is 28.3 degrees C compared with ambient air temperature. The temperature stress can reach 65.8% of the yield strength, and the temperature deformation can reach 1/1600 of the roof span, which will be more obvious in the practical roof system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of temperature field and effect of cold-formed stainless steel roof panels
    Wang, Dayang
    Xin, Zhiyong
    Wang, Mingming
    Ou, Tong
    Mao, Jihua
    Zhu, Yong
    Tan, Jian
    Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 198
  • [2] Effect of temperature and galvanization on cold-formed steel
    AbdelRahim, AB
    Polyzois, D
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1996, 8 (03) : 114 - 122
  • [3] COLD-FORMED STEEL PANELS WITH RIVETED CONNECTIONS
    YENER, M
    WHITE, RN
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 1984, 110 (05) : 1035 - 1050
  • [4] Design of cold-formed steel curved panels
    Casariego, P.
    Casafont, M.
    Ferrer, M.
    Marimon, F.
    STRUCTURES AND ARCHITECTURE, 2010, : 577 - 584
  • [5] Theoretical analysis of cold-formed stainless steel tubular joints
    Feng, Ran
    Young, Ben
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 83 : 99 - 115
  • [6] Experimental and Safety Evaluation of Cold-Formed Steel Standing-Seam Metal Roof Panels
    Koshy, Mini
    Jayachandran, S. Arul
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 23 (03)
  • [7] Compressive tests of cold-formed steel curved panels
    Xu, L
    Gong, YL
    Guo, P
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2001, 57 (12) : 1249 - 1265
  • [8] Testing of cold-formed steel wall stud panels
    Hoon Choi
    Yong-ki Lee
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2004, 8 (1) : 59 - 64
  • [9] Experimental investigation of cold-formed stainless steel columns
    Young, B
    Liu, YH
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (02): : 169 - 176
  • [10] Behaviour of cold-formed stainless steel structural members
    van den Berg, G.J.
    Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1998, 46 (1-3):