Two-Site Evaluation of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Test To Determine Colistin In Vitro Activity against Gram-Negative Bacilli

被引:63
|
作者
Simner, Patricia J. [1 ]
Bergman, Yehudit [1 ]
Trejo, Marisol [2 ]
Roberts, Ava A. [1 ]
Marayan, Remy [1 ]
Tekle, Tsigereda [1 ]
Campeau, Shelley [3 ]
Kazmi, Abida Q. [1 ]
Bell, Drew T. [1 ]
Lewis, Shawna [1 ]
Tamma, Pranita D. [4 ]
Humphries, Romney [3 ]
Hindler, Janet A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] UCLA Hlth, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Accelerate Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
colistin broth disk elution; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; colistin; method; POLYMYXIN RESISTANCE; SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; GENE;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01163-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Limited methods for colistin MIC determination are available to clinical microbiology laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test compared to that of broth microdilution (BMD) for identifying colistin MICs. CBDE was compared to colistin BMD using a collection of Gram-negative bacilli tested at two U.S. microbiology laboratories. The isolates tested included 121 retrospective clinical isolates, 45 prospective clinical isolates, and 6 mcr-l-positive Escherichia coil isolates. CBDE was performed with four 10-ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth tubes per isolate, to which 0, 1, 2, and 4 colistin 10-mu g disks were added, generating final concentrations in the tubes of 0 (growth control), 1, 2, and 4 mu g/ml, respectively. MICs were evaluated visually and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Site 2 also compared CBDE to the reference broth macrodilution (BMAD) method (n = 110 isolates). Overall, CBDE yielded a categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of 98% and 99%, respectively, compared to the results of colistin BMD. Very major errors occurred for mcr- 1-producing strains, with MICs fluctuating from 2 to 4 mu g/ml on repeat testing. The results for all other isolates were in CA with those of BMD. CBDE versus BMAD had an EA of 100% and a CA of 100%. Compared to currently used techniques, CBDE is an easy and practical method to perform colistin MIC testing. Some mcr-1-producing isolates yielded MICs of 2 mu g/ml by CBDE and 4 mu g/ml by BMD. As such, the results for isolates with colistin MICs of 2 mu g/ml by CBDE should be confirmed by the reference BMD method, and isolates with MICs of >= 2 mu g/ml should be evaluated for the presence of ma genes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The synergistic antibacterial activity and mechanism of colistin-oxethazaine combination against gram-negative pathogens
    Li, Jie
    Han, Ning
    Li, Yangyang
    Zhao, Feifei
    Xiong, Wenguang
    Zeng, Zhenling
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [42] Risk Factors for the Antibiotic Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Associated Infections in Burn Patients and the In-Vitro Susceptibility of Colistin
    Varshochi, Mojtaba
    Hasani, Alka
    Shahverdi, Parinaz Pour
    Ghavghani, Fateme Ravanbakhsh
    Matin, Somaieh
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 15 (03): : 1 - 7
  • [43] Belgian multicentre study on the in vitro activity of cefepime against gram-negative bacilli
    Verbist, L
    Glupczynski, Y
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 1996, 51 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [44] In vitro activity of arbekacin against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli
    Albano, Mariana
    Fleischmann, Wim Alexander
    Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E.
    Patel, Robin
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 54 (06) : 1118 - 1121
  • [45] In vitro synergistic activity of colistin with aminoglycosides, beta-lactams and rifampin against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria
    Chitnis, S.
    Chitnis, V.
    Chitnis, D. S.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 19 (02) : 226 - 229
  • [46] Colistin susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli: Better performance of vitek2 system than E-test compared to broth microdilution method as the gold standard test
    Das, Surojit
    Roy, Subhanita
    Roy, Samadrita
    Goelv, Gaurav
    Sinha, Subir
    Mathur, Purva
    Walia, Kamini
    Bhattacharya, Sanjay
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 38 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [47] In vitro Efficacy of Meropenem, Colistin and Tigecycline Against the Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Gram Negative Bacilli
    Gill, Maria Mushtaq
    Usman, Javaid
    Hassan, Afreenish
    Kaleem, Fatima
    Anjum, Rabia
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2015, 25 (05): : 342 - 345
  • [48] Antimicrobial activity of Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil against colistin-resistant gram-negative bacteria
    Ben Selma, Walid
    Ferjeni, Sana
    Farouk, Amr
    Marzouk, Manel
    Boukadida, Jalel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2025, 35 (01) : 169 - 181
  • [49] Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study
    Singh, Arpana
    Bhatia, Mohit
    Rekha, Sasi
    Rani, Diksha
    Kamboj, Pratiksha
    Chakraborty, Deepika
    Gupta, Pratima
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [50] In vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators against gram-negative bacilli from China: TEST 2004-2016
    Hoban, D.
    Renteria, M.
    Sahm, D.
    Johnson, A.
    Dowzicky, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2017, 50 : S100 - S100