Two-Site Evaluation of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Test To Determine Colistin In Vitro Activity against Gram-Negative Bacilli

被引:63
|
作者
Simner, Patricia J. [1 ]
Bergman, Yehudit [1 ]
Trejo, Marisol [2 ]
Roberts, Ava A. [1 ]
Marayan, Remy [1 ]
Tekle, Tsigereda [1 ]
Campeau, Shelley [3 ]
Kazmi, Abida Q. [1 ]
Bell, Drew T. [1 ]
Lewis, Shawna [1 ]
Tamma, Pranita D. [4 ]
Humphries, Romney [3 ]
Hindler, Janet A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] UCLA Hlth, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Accelerate Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
colistin broth disk elution; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; colistin; method; POLYMYXIN RESISTANCE; SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; GENE;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01163-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Limited methods for colistin MIC determination are available to clinical microbiology laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test compared to that of broth microdilution (BMD) for identifying colistin MICs. CBDE was compared to colistin BMD using a collection of Gram-negative bacilli tested at two U.S. microbiology laboratories. The isolates tested included 121 retrospective clinical isolates, 45 prospective clinical isolates, and 6 mcr-l-positive Escherichia coil isolates. CBDE was performed with four 10-ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth tubes per isolate, to which 0, 1, 2, and 4 colistin 10-mu g disks were added, generating final concentrations in the tubes of 0 (growth control), 1, 2, and 4 mu g/ml, respectively. MICs were evaluated visually and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Site 2 also compared CBDE to the reference broth macrodilution (BMAD) method (n = 110 isolates). Overall, CBDE yielded a categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of 98% and 99%, respectively, compared to the results of colistin BMD. Very major errors occurred for mcr- 1-producing strains, with MICs fluctuating from 2 to 4 mu g/ml on repeat testing. The results for all other isolates were in CA with those of BMD. CBDE versus BMAD had an EA of 100% and a CA of 100%. Compared to currently used techniques, CBDE is an easy and practical method to perform colistin MIC testing. Some mcr-1-producing isolates yielded MICs of 2 mu g/ml by CBDE and 4 mu g/ml by BMD. As such, the results for isolates with colistin MICs of 2 mu g/ml by CBDE should be confirmed by the reference BMD method, and isolates with MICs of >= 2 mu g/ml should be evaluated for the presence of ma genes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Colistin Susceptibility Testing by Colistin Broth Disk Elution MIC Method among Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Blood Culture Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Care Setting, East Delhi, India
    Nirmal, Kirti
    Singh, Narendra Pal
    Sarkar, Krishna
    Goyal, Nisha
    Gangar, Seema
    Dwivedi, Aditya Nath
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 33 (05) : 743 - 750
  • [32] Silver Nanoparticles Conjugated with Colistin Enhanced the Antimicrobial Activity against Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Muenraya, Poowadon
    Sawatdee, Somchai
    Srichana, Teerapol
    Atipairin, Apichart
    MOLECULES, 2022, 27 (18):
  • [33] Comparative in vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam against Gram-negative bacilli
    Liebowitz, LD
    Klugman, KP
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 86 (10): : 1276 - 1280
  • [34] Evaluation of the in vitro activity of new polymyxin B analogue SPR206 against clinical MDR, colistin-resistant and tigecycline-resistant Gram-negative bacilli
    Zhang, Yawei
    Zhao, Chunjiang
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Xiaojuan
    Chen, Hongbin
    Li, Henan
    Zhang, Feifei
    Wang, Hui
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (09) : 2609 - 2615
  • [35] Comparative Evaluation of CHROMagar COL-APSE, MicroScan Walkaway, ComASP Colistin, and Colistin MAC Test in Detecting Colistin-resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Sekyere, John Osei
    Sephofane, Arnold Karabo
    Mbelle, Nontombi Marylucy
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [36] Comparative Evaluation of CHROMagar COL-APSE, MicroScan Walkaway, ComASP Colistin, and Colistin MAC Test in Detecting Colistin-resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
    John Osei Sekyere
    Arnold Karabo Sephofane
    Nontombi Marylucy Mbelle
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [37] In Vitro Activity of Colistin and Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole Against Consortia of Multidrug Resistant Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Lower Respiratory Tract
    Juhasz, Emese
    Kovacs, Andrea
    Pongracz, Julia
    Ivan, Miklos
    Kristof, Katalin
    JUNDISHAPUR JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 10 (07)
  • [38] In vitro activity of daptomycin in combination with low-dose colistin against a diverse collection of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens
    L. Phee
    M. Hornsey
    D. W. Wareham
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2013, 32 : 1291 - 1294
  • [39] In vitro activity of daptomycin in combination with low-dose colistin against a diverse collection of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens
    Phee, L.
    Hornsey, M.
    Wareham, D. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 32 (10) : 1291 - 1294
  • [40] Synergistic Activity and Biofilm Formation Effect of Colistin Combined with PFK-158 Against Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
    Chen, Liqiong
    Yu, Kaihang
    Chen, Lijiang
    Zheng, Xiangkuo
    Huang, Na
    Lin, Yishuai
    Jia, Huaiyu
    Liao, Wenli
    Cao, Jianming
    Zhou, Tieli
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2021, 14 : 2143 - 2154