Two-Site Evaluation of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Test To Determine Colistin In Vitro Activity against Gram-Negative Bacilli

被引:63
|
作者
Simner, Patricia J. [1 ]
Bergman, Yehudit [1 ]
Trejo, Marisol [2 ]
Roberts, Ava A. [1 ]
Marayan, Remy [1 ]
Tekle, Tsigereda [1 ]
Campeau, Shelley [3 ]
Kazmi, Abida Q. [1 ]
Bell, Drew T. [1 ]
Lewis, Shawna [1 ]
Tamma, Pranita D. [4 ]
Humphries, Romney [3 ]
Hindler, Janet A. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] UCLA Hlth, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Accelerate Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Tucson, AZ USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
colistin broth disk elution; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; colistin; method; POLYMYXIN RESISTANCE; SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFICATION; GENE;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01163-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Limited methods for colistin MIC determination are available to clinical microbiology laboratories. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) test compared to that of broth microdilution (BMD) for identifying colistin MICs. CBDE was compared to colistin BMD using a collection of Gram-negative bacilli tested at two U.S. microbiology laboratories. The isolates tested included 121 retrospective clinical isolates, 45 prospective clinical isolates, and 6 mcr-l-positive Escherichia coil isolates. CBDE was performed with four 10-ml cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth tubes per isolate, to which 0, 1, 2, and 4 colistin 10-mu g disks were added, generating final concentrations in the tubes of 0 (growth control), 1, 2, and 4 mu g/ml, respectively. MICs were evaluated visually and interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Site 2 also compared CBDE to the reference broth macrodilution (BMAD) method (n = 110 isolates). Overall, CBDE yielded a categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) of 98% and 99%, respectively, compared to the results of colistin BMD. Very major errors occurred for mcr- 1-producing strains, with MICs fluctuating from 2 to 4 mu g/ml on repeat testing. The results for all other isolates were in CA with those of BMD. CBDE versus BMAD had an EA of 100% and a CA of 100%. Compared to currently used techniques, CBDE is an easy and practical method to perform colistin MIC testing. Some mcr-1-producing isolates yielded MICs of 2 mu g/ml by CBDE and 4 mu g/ml by BMD. As such, the results for isolates with colistin MICs of 2 mu g/ml by CBDE should be confirmed by the reference BMD method, and isolates with MICs of >= 2 mu g/ml should be evaluated for the presence of ma genes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IN VITRO ACTIVITY OF CARBENICILLIN AGAINST GRAM-NEGATIVE BACILLI
    BODEY, GP
    TERRELL, LM
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1968, 95 (05) : 1587 - &
  • [22] Comparison of E-test and disc diffusion methods for the in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of colistin in multi-drug resistant Gram-negative Bacilli
    Somily, Ali M.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (05) : 507 - 511
  • [23] Evaluation of the NG-Test MCR-1 Lateral Flow Assay and EDTA-Colistin Broth Disk Elution Methods To Detect Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance among Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates
    Fenwick, Alexander J.
    Bergman, Yehudit
    Lewis, Shawna
    Yee, Rebecca
    Uhlemann, Anne-Catrin
    Cole, Nicolynn
    Kohner, Peggy
    Ordak, Carly
    Green, Daniel A.
    Schuetz, Audrey N.
    Humphries, Romney
    Simner, Patricia J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (04)
  • [24] In Vitro Activity of Telavancin in Combination with Colistin versus Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogens
    Hornsey, Michael
    Longshaw, Christopher
    Phee, Lynette
    Wareham, David W.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (06) : 3080 - 3085
  • [25] Evaluation of colistin as an agent against multi-resistant in Gram-negative bacteria
    Li, J
    Nation, RL
    Milne, RW
    Turnidge, JD
    Coulthard, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 25 (01) : 11 - 25
  • [26] Activity of fosfomycin/colistin combinations against planktonic and biofilm Gram-negative pathogens
    Boncompagni, Selene Rebecca
    Micieli, Maria
    Di Maggio, Tiziana
    Aiezza, Noemi
    Antonelli, Alberto
    Giani, Tommaso
    Padoani, Gloria
    Vailati, Silvia
    Pallecchi, Lucia
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 77 (08) : 2199 - 2208
  • [27] Combining with domiphen bromide restores colistin efficacy against colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in vitro and in vivo
    Chen, Huanchang
    Hu, Panjie
    Liu, Haifeng
    Liu, Sichen
    Liu, Yan
    Chen, Lei
    Feng, Luozhu
    Chen, Lijiang
    Zhou, Tieli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2024, 63 (02)
  • [28] In vitro synergistic activity of NCL195 in combination with colistin against Gram-negative bacterial pathogens
    Hang Thi Nguyen
    Venter, Henrietta
    Veltman, Tania
    Williams, Ruth
    O'Donovan, Lisa Anne
    Russell, Cecilia C.
    McCluskey, Adam
    Page, Stephen W.
    Ogunniyi, Abiodun David
    Trott, Darren J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2021, 57 (05)
  • [29] Comparison of Agar Dilution to Broth Microdilution for Testing In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Gram-Negative Bacilli
    Albano, Mariana
    Karau, Melissa J.
    Schuetz, Audrey N.
    Patel, Robin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (01)
  • [30] Activity of the colistin-rifampicin combination against colistin-resistant, carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria
    Nastro, Marcela
    Hernan Rodriguez, Carlos
    Monge, Renata
    Zintgraff, Jonathan
    Neira, Liliana
    Rebollo, Mirta
    Vay, Carlos
    Famiglietti, Angela
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 26 (04) : 211 - 216