Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:39
|
作者
Mirhaidari, Shayda J. [1 ]
Azouz, Vitali [2 ]
Wagner, Douglas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 55 Arch St,Suit 2F, Akron, OH 44304 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Akron, OH 44304 USA
关键词
breast implants; breast reconstruction; subcutaneous breast reconstruction; direct to implant; prepectoral breast reconstruction; acellular dermal matrix; DIRECT-TO-IMPLANT; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common postmastectomy breast reconstruction modality with over 86,000 procedures performed in 2017. Although various methods for reconstruction techniques have been described, partial subpectoral implant placement with or without acellular dermal matrix coverage remains the most popular approach. Recently, prepectoral implant placement has gained increased recognition as a method that avoids some of the potential morbidities of submuscular implant placement. Currently, few studies have examined the outcomes of performing this approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral direct to implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction. Methods Data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions at our institution from February 2016 to November 2017 were collected. The incidence of complications such as mastectomy skin flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, implant loss, and unexpected reoperation were recorded and compared with a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent subpectoral DTI immediate breast reconstruction from May 2014 to July 2015. Results One hundred twelve prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. Four breasts (4.4%) were diagnosed with infection. There were 8 breasts (7.1%) that suffered from mastectomy skin flap necrosis (5 partial thickness necrosis, 3 full thickness necrosis). There was 1 implant loss related to full thickness necrosis that required salvage with autologous tissue reconstruction. Prepectoral breast reconstruction had less esthetic revisions and comparable complications when compared with the historical subpectoral cohort. Conclusions When compared with the subpectoral DTI approach, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction grants favorable complication rates and improved esthetic outcomes. Prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction is a safe modality that should be considered in any patient who is a candidate for immediate breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visualized pre- and subpectoral implant placement for immediate breast reconstruction
    Dyrberg, Diana L.
    Bille, Camilla
    Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
    Sorensen, Jens A.
    Thomsen, Jorn B.
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 : S251 - S254
  • [42] Current status prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction in the USA
    Piccolo, Paulo P.
    Venturi, Mark
    Mesbahi, Alex N.
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2023, 12 (12) : 1794 - 1805
  • [43] Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Badarin, Faris
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (01) : 22E - 31E
  • [44] Acellular dermal matrix in implant-based immediate breast reconstructions: a comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral approach
    Chandarana, Mihir Navin
    Jafferbhoy, Sadaf
    Marla, Sekhar
    Soumian, Soni
    Narayanan, Sankaran
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2018, 7 : S64 - S69
  • [45] Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant versus Staged Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Complications
    Finkelstein, Emily R.
    Laureano, Natalia Vidal
    Azizi, Armina
    Smartz, Taylor
    Zheng, Caiwei
    Lessard, Anne-Sophie
    Panthaki, Zubin
    Oeltjen, John
    Kassira, Wrood
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (02) : 224e - 232e
  • [46] The Cost-Effectiveness of Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Implant Placement for Breast Reconstruction: A Markov Analysis
    Yesantharao, Pooja S.
    Eggert, Gina
    Thawanyarat, Kometh
    Nazerali, Rahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S211 - S211
  • [47] A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique
    Lee, Joon Seok
    Park, Eunhee
    Lee, Jung Ho
    Lee, Jeeyeon
    Park, Ho Yong
    Yang, Jung Dug
    Jung, Tae-Du
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (03) : 2520 - 2529
  • [48] Examining the Effects of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Arquette, Connor P.
    Yesantharao, Pooja S.
    Borrelli, Mimi R.
    Broderick, Kristen P.
    Cheesborough, Jennifer E.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (5S) : S390 - S394
  • [49] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in High-Body Mass Index Patients
    Walker, Nicholas J.
    Park, Jungwon G.
    Maus, Jacob C.
    Motamedi, Vida
    Rebowe, Ryan E.
    Runyan, Christopher M.
    Tucker, Scott L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 87 (02) : 136 - 143
  • [50] Comparative complications of prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Wu, Yongxiao
    Yu, Lizhi
    Huang, Miaoyan
    Huang, Yanping
    Li, Chunyan
    Liang, Yiwen
    Liang, Weiming
    Qin, Tian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14