Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:39
|
作者
Mirhaidari, Shayda J. [1 ]
Azouz, Vitali [2 ]
Wagner, Douglas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 55 Arch St,Suit 2F, Akron, OH 44304 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Akron, OH 44304 USA
关键词
breast implants; breast reconstruction; subcutaneous breast reconstruction; direct to implant; prepectoral breast reconstruction; acellular dermal matrix; DIRECT-TO-IMPLANT; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common postmastectomy breast reconstruction modality with over 86,000 procedures performed in 2017. Although various methods for reconstruction techniques have been described, partial subpectoral implant placement with or without acellular dermal matrix coverage remains the most popular approach. Recently, prepectoral implant placement has gained increased recognition as a method that avoids some of the potential morbidities of submuscular implant placement. Currently, few studies have examined the outcomes of performing this approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral direct to implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction. Methods Data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions at our institution from February 2016 to November 2017 were collected. The incidence of complications such as mastectomy skin flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, implant loss, and unexpected reoperation were recorded and compared with a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent subpectoral DTI immediate breast reconstruction from May 2014 to July 2015. Results One hundred twelve prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. Four breasts (4.4%) were diagnosed with infection. There were 8 breasts (7.1%) that suffered from mastectomy skin flap necrosis (5 partial thickness necrosis, 3 full thickness necrosis). There was 1 implant loss related to full thickness necrosis that required salvage with autologous tissue reconstruction. Prepectoral breast reconstruction had less esthetic revisions and comparable complications when compared with the historical subpectoral cohort. Conclusions When compared with the subpectoral DTI approach, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction grants favorable complication rates and improved esthetic outcomes. Prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction is a safe modality that should be considered in any patient who is a candidate for immediate breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revision of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction from the Subpectoral to the Prepectoral Plane
    Stachura, Anna
    Antognoli, Lauren
    Jackson, Rubie
    Holton, Tripp, III
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S623 - S624
  • [32] INVITED DISCUSSION ON: Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
    Ceravolo, Mario Pelle
    de Vita, Roy
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (04) : 1300 - 1302
  • [33] Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement
    Wormer, Blair A.
    Valmadrid, Al C.
    Kumar, Nishant Ganesh
    Al Kassis, Salam
    Rankin, Timothy M.
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    Higdon, Kent K.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [34] When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Adesi, Liliana Barone
    Macri, Giulia
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2023, 43 (12) : NP1071 - NP1077
  • [35] Comparing Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement Outcomes in Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Borrelli, Mimi R.
    Cai, Lawrence
    Moshrefi, Shawn
    Sando, Ian C.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 : S329 - S335
  • [36] INVITED DISCUSSION ON: Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient’s Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
    Mario Pelle Ceravolo
    Roy de Vita
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 1300 - 1302
  • [37] A retrospective study comparing early outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral implant based breast reconstruction
    Kanesalingam, K.
    Khan, A.
    Osman, H.
    Karat, I.
    Laidlaw, I. J.
    Daoud, R.
    [J]. BREAST, 2017, 32 : S114 - S114
  • [38] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction How Do We Choose?
    Vingan, Perri S.
    Kim, Minji
    Rochlin, Danielle
    Allen Jr, Robert J.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 32 (04) : 761 - 776
  • [39] Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Asaad, Malke
    Hassan, Abbas M.
    Morris, Natalie
    Kumar, Saloni
    Liu, Jun
    Butler, Charles E.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2023, 43 (10) : NP774 - NP786
  • [40] Discussion: Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement
    Haddock, Nicholas T.
    Teotia, Sumeet S.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (02) : 287 - 288