Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:39
|
作者
Mirhaidari, Shayda J. [1 ]
Azouz, Vitali [2 ]
Wagner, Douglas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 55 Arch St,Suit 2F, Akron, OH 44304 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Akron, OH 44304 USA
关键词
breast implants; breast reconstruction; subcutaneous breast reconstruction; direct to implant; prepectoral breast reconstruction; acellular dermal matrix; DIRECT-TO-IMPLANT; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common postmastectomy breast reconstruction modality with over 86,000 procedures performed in 2017. Although various methods for reconstruction techniques have been described, partial subpectoral implant placement with or without acellular dermal matrix coverage remains the most popular approach. Recently, prepectoral implant placement has gained increased recognition as a method that avoids some of the potential morbidities of submuscular implant placement. Currently, few studies have examined the outcomes of performing this approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral direct to implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction. Methods Data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions at our institution from February 2016 to November 2017 were collected. The incidence of complications such as mastectomy skin flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, implant loss, and unexpected reoperation were recorded and compared with a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent subpectoral DTI immediate breast reconstruction from May 2014 to July 2015. Results One hundred twelve prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. Four breasts (4.4%) were diagnosed with infection. There were 8 breasts (7.1%) that suffered from mastectomy skin flap necrosis (5 partial thickness necrosis, 3 full thickness necrosis). There was 1 implant loss related to full thickness necrosis that required salvage with autologous tissue reconstruction. Prepectoral breast reconstruction had less esthetic revisions and comparable complications when compared with the historical subpectoral cohort. Conclusions When compared with the subpectoral DTI approach, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction grants favorable complication rates and improved esthetic outcomes. Prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction is a safe modality that should be considered in any patient who is a candidate for immediate breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
    Cogliandro, Annalisa
    Salzillo, Rosa
    De Bernardis, Riccardo
    Loria, Francesco Saverio
    Petrucci, Valeria
    Barone, Mauro
    Tenna, Stefania
    Cagli, Barbara
    Persichetti, Paolo
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (04) : 1291 - 1299
  • [22] Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Traditional Subpectoral Technique versus Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Scardina, Lorenzo
    Di Leone, Alba
    Terribile, Daniela Andreina
    Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
    Magno, Stefano
    D'Archi, Sabatino
    Franco, Antonio
    Mason, Elena Jane
    Carnassale, Beatrice
    Murando, Federica
    Orlandi, Armando
    Barone Adesi, Liliana
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Masetti, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 12
  • [23] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q
    Scarabosio, Anna
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    Caputo, Glenda
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (15) : 3006 - 3007
  • [24] Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage
    Jones, Glyn
    Yoo, Aran
    King, Victor
    Jao, Brian
    Wang, Huaping
    Rammos, Charalambos
    Elwood, Eric
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (06) : 31S - 38S
  • [25] Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Ostapenko, Edvin
    Nixdorf, Larissa
    Devyatko, Yelena
    Wimmer, Kerstin
    Exner, Ruth
    Fitzal, Florian
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [26] Evaluation of post-operative complications and adjuvant treatments following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix
    Bassi, Romane
    Jankowski, Clementine
    Dabajuyo, Sandrine
    Burnier, Pierre
    Coutant, Charles
    Vincent, Laura
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 95 : 402 - 410
  • [27] Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Ostapenko, E.
    Nixdorf, L.
    Devyatko, Y.
    Exner, R.
    Wimmer, K.
    Fitzal, F.
    [J]. BREAST, 2023, 68 : S86 - S86
  • [28] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ostapenko, Edvin
    Nixdorf, Larissa
    Devyatko, Yelena
    Exner, Ruth
    Wimmer, Kerstin
    Fitzal, Florian
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 126 - 136
  • [29] Risk factors for complications in prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Sinnott, Catherine
    Pronovost, Mary
    Hodyl, Christine
    Lynch, Melanie
    Young, Freya
    Edwards, Sanford
    Young, Anke Ott
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 94 - 95
  • [30] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
    Edvin Ostapenko
    Larissa Nixdorf
    Yelena Devyatko
    Ruth Exner
    Kerstin Wimmer
    Florian Fitzal
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 126 - 136