Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:39
|
作者
Mirhaidari, Shayda J. [1 ]
Azouz, Vitali [2 ]
Wagner, Douglas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 55 Arch St,Suit 2F, Akron, OH 44304 USA
[2] Summa Hlth Syst, Akron City Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Akron, OH 44304 USA
关键词
breast implants; breast reconstruction; subcutaneous breast reconstruction; direct to implant; prepectoral breast reconstruction; acellular dermal matrix; DIRECT-TO-IMPLANT; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common postmastectomy breast reconstruction modality with over 86,000 procedures performed in 2017. Although various methods for reconstruction techniques have been described, partial subpectoral implant placement with or without acellular dermal matrix coverage remains the most popular approach. Recently, prepectoral implant placement has gained increased recognition as a method that avoids some of the potential morbidities of submuscular implant placement. Currently, few studies have examined the outcomes of performing this approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral direct to implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction. Methods Data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions at our institution from February 2016 to November 2017 were collected. The incidence of complications such as mastectomy skin flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, implant loss, and unexpected reoperation were recorded and compared with a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent subpectoral DTI immediate breast reconstruction from May 2014 to July 2015. Results One hundred twelve prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. Four breasts (4.4%) were diagnosed with infection. There were 8 breasts (7.1%) that suffered from mastectomy skin flap necrosis (5 partial thickness necrosis, 3 full thickness necrosis). There was 1 implant loss related to full thickness necrosis that required salvage with autologous tissue reconstruction. Prepectoral breast reconstruction had less esthetic revisions and comparable complications when compared with the historical subpectoral cohort. Conclusions When compared with the subpectoral DTI approach, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction grants favorable complication rates and improved esthetic outcomes. Prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction is a safe modality that should be considered in any patient who is a candidate for immediate breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
    Nikhil Sobti
    Rachel E. Weitzman
    Kassandra P. Nealon
    Rachel B. Jimenez
    Lisa Gfrerer
    David Mattos
    Richard J. Ehrlichman
    Michele Gadd
    Michelle Specht
    William G. Austen
    Eric C. Liao
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [2] Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
    Sobti, Nikhil
    Weitzman, Rachel E.
    Nealon, Kassandra P.
    Jimenez, Rachel B.
    Gfrerer, Lisa
    Mattos, David
    Ehrlichman, Richard J.
    Gadd, Michele
    Specht, Michelle
    Austen, William G.
    Liao, Eric C.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [3] Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with prepectoral vs. subpectoral approach: a narrative review
    Velotti, Nunzio
    Rocco, Nicola
    Vitiello, Antonio
    Berardi, Giovanna
    Pontillo, Martina
    Musella, Mario
    Masone, Stefania
    [J]. ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2023, 7
  • [4] Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy
    Roberts, Kirsty
    Mills, Nicola
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Lane, Athene
    Clement, Clare
    Hollingworth, William
    Taylor, Jodi
    Holcombe, Chris
    Skillman, Joanna
    Fairhurst, Katherine
    Whisker, Lisa
    Cutress, Ramsey
    Thrush, Steven
    Fairbrother, Patricia
    Potter, Shelley
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [5] A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Hong, Seung Eun
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Plachinski, Sarah J.
    Boehm, Lucas M.
    Adamson, Karri A.
    LoGiudice, John A.
    Doren, Erin L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (07) : E3709
  • [7] Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    Kapoor, Trishul
    Banuelos, Joseph
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    Martinez-Jorge, Jorys
    Nguyen, Minh-Doan T.
    Tran, Nho V.
    Harless, Christin A.
    Degnim, Amy C.
    Jakub, James W.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (04) : 361 - 365
  • [8] Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Cemaj, Sophie L.
    Martin, Shanique A.
    Cheesborough, Jennifer E.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (5S) : S409 - S413
  • [9] Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Yang, Jun Young
    Kim, Chan Woo
    Lee, Jang Won
    Kim, Seung Ki
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Hwang, Euna
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2019, 46 (06): : 550 - 557
  • [10] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction A Meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Xu, Gang
    Yu, Nanze
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (04) : 437 - 447